PATCH v5 4/4] ree: Improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined ABI interfaces.

  Hello All:

This new version of patch 4 use improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined ABI interfaces.
Bootstrapped and regtested on power64-linux-gnu.

Review comments incorporated.

Thanks & Regards
Ajit

Improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined abi interfaces

For rs6000 target we see redundant zero and sign
extension and done to improve ree pass to eliminate
such redundant zero and sign extension using defined
ABI interfaces.

2023-06-01  Ajit Kumar Agarwal  <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* ree.cc (combine_reaching_defs): Use of  zero_extend and sign_extend
	defined abi interfaces.
	(add_removable_extension): Use of defined abi interfaces for no
	reaching defs.
	(abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p): New function.
	(abi_extension_candidate_p): New function.
	(abi_extension_candidate_argno_p): New function.
	(abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p): New function.
	(abi_target_promote_function_mode): New function.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
---
 gcc/ree.cc                                    | 199 +++++++++++++++---
 .../g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C          |  13 ++
 2 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
  

On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 10:53:02 +0530
Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello All:
> 
> This new version of patch 4 use improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined ABI interfaces.
> Bootstrapped and regtested on power64-linux-gnu.
> 
> Review comments incorporated.

Not a review:

/scratch/src/gcc-14.mine$ ./contrib/check_GNU_style.py /tmp/rs6k-ree-v5.patch 
=== ERROR type #1: there should be exactly one space between function name and parenthesis (2 error(s)) ===
gcc/ree.cc:1461:33:	      if (state.defs_list.length() != 0)
gcc/ree.cc:1487:42:       if ((i+1) < reinsn_copy_list.length())

=== ERROR type #2: trailing operator (1 error(s)) ===
gcc/ree.cc:761:24:  machine_mode tgt_mode =

$ grep -E "^[-+].*[^[:space:]\.][[:space:]][[:space:]]" /tmp/rs6k-ree-v5.patch 
+   an return  registers.  */
+  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
+  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
+  if (code !=  ZERO_EXTEND)

And maybe you could add fewer empty lines in combine_reaching_defs()

thanks,
  

All:

Ok for trunk. Please review.


Thanks & Regards
Ajit

On 01/06/23 10:53 am, Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hello All:
> 
> This new version of patch 4 use improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined ABI interfaces.
> Bootstrapped and regtested on power64-linux-gnu.
> 
> Review comments incorporated.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Ajit
> 
> Improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined abi interfaces
> 
> For rs6000 target we see redundant zero and sign
> extension and done to improve ree pass to eliminate
> such redundant zero and sign extension using defined
> ABI interfaces.
> 
> 2023-06-01  Ajit Kumar Agarwal  <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* ree.cc (combine_reaching_defs): Use of  zero_extend and sign_extend
> 	defined abi interfaces.
> 	(add_removable_extension): Use of defined abi interfaces for no
> 	reaching defs.
> 	(abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p): New function.
> 	(abi_extension_candidate_p): New function.
> 	(abi_extension_candidate_argno_p): New function.
> 	(abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p): New function.
> 	(abi_target_promote_function_mode): New function.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>         * g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> ---
>  gcc/ree.cc                                    | 199 +++++++++++++++---
>  .../g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C          |  13 ++
>  2 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/ree.cc b/gcc/ree.cc
> index fc04249fa84..2025a7c43da 100644
> --- a/gcc/ree.cc
> +++ b/gcc/ree.cc
> @@ -514,7 +514,8 @@ get_uses (rtx_insn *insn, rtx reg)
>      if (REGNO (DF_REF_REG (def)) == REGNO (reg))
>        break;
>  
> -  gcc_assert (def != NULL);
> +  if (def == NULL)
> +    return NULL;
>  
>    ref_chain = DF_REF_CHAIN (def);
>  
> @@ -750,6 +751,120 @@ get_extended_src_reg (rtx src)
>    return src;
>  }
>  
> +/* Return TRUE if target mode is equal to source mode of zero_extend
> +   or sign_extend otherwise false.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_target_promote_function_mode (machine_mode mode)
> +{
> +  int unsignedp;
> +  machine_mode tgt_mode =
> +    targetm.calls.promote_function_mode (NULL_TREE, mode, &unsignedp,
> +					 NULL_TREE, 1);
> +
> +  if (tgt_mode == mode)
> +    return true;
> +  else
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
> +   an return  registers.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (rtx_insn *insn, int regno)
> +{
> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
> +
> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  if (FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P (regno))
> +    return true;
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if reg source operand of zero_extend is argument registers
> +   and not return registers and source and destination operand are same
> +   and mode of source and destination operand are not same.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_extension_candidate_p (rtx_insn *insn)
> +{
> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
> +
> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  machine_mode ext_dst_mode = GET_MODE (SET_DEST (set));
> +  rtx orig_src = XEXP (SET_SRC (set),0);
> +
> +  bool copy_needed
> +    = (REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
> +
> +  if (!copy_needed && ext_dst_mode != GET_MODE (orig_src)
> +      && FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (REGNO (orig_src))
> +      && !abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (insn, REGNO (orig_src)))
> +    return true;
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
> +   an argument registers.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_extension_candidate_argno_p (rtx_code code, int regno)
> +{
> +  if (code !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  if (FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (regno))
> +    return true;
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn doesn't have defs and have
> + * uses without RTX_BIN_ARITH/RTX_COMM_ARITH/RTX_UNARY rtx class.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p (rtx_insn *insn)
> +{
> +  if (side_effects_p (PATTERN (insn)))
> +    return false;
> +
> +  struct df_link *uses
> +    = get_uses (insn, SET_DEST (PATTERN (insn)));
> +
> +  if (!uses)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  for (df_link *use = uses; use; use = use->next)
> +    {
> +      if (!use->ref)
> +	return false;
> +
> +      if (BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn)
> +	  != BLOCK_FOR_INSN (DF_REF_INSN (use->ref)))
> +	return false;
> +
> +      rtx_insn *use_insn = DF_REF_INSN (use->ref);
> +
> +      if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (use_insn)) == SET)
> +	{
> +	  rtx_code code = GET_CODE (SET_SRC (PATTERN (use_insn)));
> +
> +	  if (GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_BIN_ARITH
> +	      || GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_COMM_ARITH
> +	      || GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_UNARY)
> +	    return false;
> +	}
> +     }
> +  return true;
> +}
> +
>  /* This function goes through all reaching defs of the source
>     of the candidate for elimination (CAND) and tries to combine
>     the extension with the definition instruction.  The changes
> @@ -770,6 +885,11 @@ combine_reaching_defs (ext_cand *cand, const_rtx set_pat, ext_state *state)
>  
>    state->defs_list.truncate (0);
>    state->copies_list.truncate (0);
> +  rtx orig_src = XEXP (SET_SRC (cand->expr),0);
> +
> +  if (abi_extension_candidate_p (cand->insn)
> +      && (!get_defs (cand->insn, orig_src, NULL)))
> +    return abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p (cand->insn);
>  
>    outcome = make_defs_and_copies_lists (cand->insn, set_pat, state);
>  
> @@ -1036,6 +1156,15 @@ combine_reaching_defs (ext_cand *cand, const_rtx set_pat, ext_state *state)
>          }
>      }
>  
> +  rtx insn_set = single_set (cand->insn);
> +
> +  machine_mode mode = (GET_MODE (XEXP (SET_SRC (insn_set), 0)));
> +
> +  bool promote_p = abi_target_promote_function_mode (mode);
> +
> +  if (promote_p)
> +    return true;
> +
>    if (merge_successful)
>      {
>        /* Commit the changes here if possible
> @@ -1112,26 +1241,34 @@ add_removable_extension (const_rtx expr, rtx_insn *insn,
>        rtx reg = XEXP (src, 0);
>        struct df_link *defs, *def;
>        ext_cand *cand;
> +      defs = get_defs (insn, reg, NULL);
>  
>        /* Zero-extension of an undefined value is partly defined (it's
>  	 completely undefined for sign-extension, though).  So if there exists
>  	 a path from the entry to this zero-extension that leaves this register
>  	 uninitialized, removing the extension could change the behavior of
>  	 correct programs.  So first, check it is not the case.  */
> -      if (code == ZERO_EXTEND && !bitmap_bit_p (init_regs, REGNO (reg)))
> +      if (!defs && abi_extension_candidate_argno_p (code, REGNO (reg)))
>  	{
> -	  if (dump_file)
> -	    {
> -	      fprintf (dump_file, "Cannot eliminate extension:\n");
> -	      print_rtl_single (dump_file, insn);
> -	      fprintf (dump_file, " because it can operate on uninitialized"
> -			          " data\n");
> -	    }
> +	  ext_cand e = {expr, code, mode, insn};
> +	  insn_list->safe_push (e);
>  	  return;
>  	}
>  
> +       if ((code == ZERO_EXTEND
> +	    && !bitmap_bit_p (init_regs, REGNO (reg))))
> +	  {
> +	    if (dump_file)
> +	      {
> +		fprintf (dump_file, "Cannot eliminate extension:\n");
> +		print_rtl_single (dump_file, insn);
> +		fprintf (dump_file, " because it can operate on uninitialized"
> +				    " data\n");
> +	      }
> +	    return;
> +	  }
> +
>        /* Second, make sure we can get all the reaching definitions.  */
> -      defs = get_defs (insn, reg, NULL);
>        if (!defs)
>  	{
>  	  if (dump_file)
> @@ -1321,7 +1458,8 @@ find_and_remove_re (void)
>  	      && (REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0))))
>  	    {
>                reinsn_copy_list.safe_push (curr_cand->insn);
> -              reinsn_copy_list.safe_push (state.defs_list[0]);
> +	      if (state.defs_list.length() != 0)
> +		reinsn_copy_list.safe_push (state.defs_list[0]);
>  	    }
>  	  reinsn_del_list.safe_push (curr_cand->insn);
>  	  state.modified[INSN_UID (curr_cand->insn)].deleted = 1;
> @@ -1342,24 +1480,27 @@ find_and_remove_re (void)
>       Remember that the memory reference will be changed to refer to the
>       destination of the extention.  So we're actually emitting a copy
>       from the new destination to the old destination.  */
> -  for (unsigned int i = 0; i < reinsn_copy_list.length (); i += 2)
> -    {
> -      rtx_insn *curr_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i];
> -      rtx_insn *def_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i + 1];
> -
> -      /* Use the mode of the destination of the defining insn
> -	 for the mode of the copy.  This is necessary if the
> -	 defining insn was used to eliminate a second extension
> -	 that was wider than the first.  */
> -      rtx sub_rtx = *get_sub_rtx (def_insn);
> -      rtx set = single_set (curr_insn);
> -      rtx new_dst = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
> -				 REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
> -      rtx new_src = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
> -				 REGNO (SET_DEST (set)));
> -      rtx new_set = gen_rtx_SET (new_dst, new_src);
> -      emit_insn_after (new_set, def_insn);
> -    }
> +   for (unsigned int i = 0; i < reinsn_copy_list.length (); i += 2)
> +     {
> +       rtx_insn *curr_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i];
> +
> +       if ((i+1) < reinsn_copy_list.length())
> +	 {
> +	   rtx_insn *def_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i + 1];
> +	   /* Use the mode of the destination of the defining insn
> +	      for the mode of the copy.  This is necessary if the
> +	      defining insn was used to eliminate a second extension
> +	      that was wider than the first.  */
> +	   rtx sub_rtx = *get_sub_rtx (def_insn);
> +	   rtx set = single_set (curr_insn);
> +	   rtx new_dst = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
> +				      REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
> +	   rtx new_src = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
> +				      REGNO (SET_DEST (set)));
> +	   rtx new_set = gen_rtx_SET (new_dst, new_src);
> +	   emit_insn_after (new_set, def_insn);
> +	}
> +      }
>  
>    /* Delete all useless extensions here in one sweep.  */
>    FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (reinsn_del_list, i, curr_insn)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..5a050df06ff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-options "-mcpu=power9 -O2" } */
> +
> +void *memset(void *b, int c, unsigned long len)
> +{
> +  unsigned long i;
> +
> +  for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> +    ((unsigned char *)b)[i] = c;
> +
> +   return b;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\mrlwinm\M" } } */
  

All:

Ok for trunk. Please review.

Thanks & Regards
Ajit

On 01/06/23 10:53 am, Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hello All:
> 
> This new version of patch 4 use improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined ABI interfaces.
> Bootstrapped and regtested on power64-linux-gnu.
> 
> Review comments incorporated.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Ajit
> 
> Improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined abi interfaces
> 
> For rs6000 target we see redundant zero and sign
> extension and done to improve ree pass to eliminate
> such redundant zero and sign extension using defined
> ABI interfaces.
> 
> 2023-06-01  Ajit Kumar Agarwal  <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* ree.cc (combine_reaching_defs): Use of  zero_extend and sign_extend
> 	defined abi interfaces.
> 	(add_removable_extension): Use of defined abi interfaces for no
> 	reaching defs.
> 	(abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p): New function.
> 	(abi_extension_candidate_p): New function.
> 	(abi_extension_candidate_argno_p): New function.
> 	(abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p): New function.
> 	(abi_target_promote_function_mode): New function.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>         * g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> ---
>  gcc/ree.cc                                    | 199 +++++++++++++++---
>  .../g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C          |  13 ++
>  2 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/ree.cc b/gcc/ree.cc
> index fc04249fa84..2025a7c43da 100644
> --- a/gcc/ree.cc
> +++ b/gcc/ree.cc
> @@ -514,7 +514,8 @@ get_uses (rtx_insn *insn, rtx reg)
>      if (REGNO (DF_REF_REG (def)) == REGNO (reg))
>        break;
>  
> -  gcc_assert (def != NULL);
> +  if (def == NULL)
> +    return NULL;
>  
>    ref_chain = DF_REF_CHAIN (def);
>  
> @@ -750,6 +751,120 @@ get_extended_src_reg (rtx src)
>    return src;
>  }
>  
> +/* Return TRUE if target mode is equal to source mode of zero_extend
> +   or sign_extend otherwise false.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_target_promote_function_mode (machine_mode mode)
> +{
> +  int unsignedp;
> +  machine_mode tgt_mode =
> +    targetm.calls.promote_function_mode (NULL_TREE, mode, &unsignedp,
> +					 NULL_TREE, 1);
> +
> +  if (tgt_mode == mode)
> +    return true;
> +  else
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
> +   an return  registers.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (rtx_insn *insn, int regno)
> +{
> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
> +
> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  if (FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P (regno))
> +    return true;
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if reg source operand of zero_extend is argument registers
> +   and not return registers and source and destination operand are same
> +   and mode of source and destination operand are not same.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_extension_candidate_p (rtx_insn *insn)
> +{
> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
> +
> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  machine_mode ext_dst_mode = GET_MODE (SET_DEST (set));
> +  rtx orig_src = XEXP (SET_SRC (set),0);
> +
> +  bool copy_needed
> +    = (REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
> +
> +  if (!copy_needed && ext_dst_mode != GET_MODE (orig_src)
> +      && FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (REGNO (orig_src))
> +      && !abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (insn, REGNO (orig_src)))
> +    return true;
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
> +   an argument registers.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_extension_candidate_argno_p (rtx_code code, int regno)
> +{
> +  if (code !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  if (FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (regno))
> +    return true;
> +
> +  return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn doesn't have defs and have
> + * uses without RTX_BIN_ARITH/RTX_COMM_ARITH/RTX_UNARY rtx class.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p (rtx_insn *insn)
> +{
> +  if (side_effects_p (PATTERN (insn)))
> +    return false;
> +
> +  struct df_link *uses
> +    = get_uses (insn, SET_DEST (PATTERN (insn)));
> +
> +  if (!uses)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  for (df_link *use = uses; use; use = use->next)
> +    {
> +      if (!use->ref)
> +	return false;
> +
> +      if (BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn)
> +	  != BLOCK_FOR_INSN (DF_REF_INSN (use->ref)))
> +	return false;
> +
> +      rtx_insn *use_insn = DF_REF_INSN (use->ref);
> +
> +      if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (use_insn)) == SET)
> +	{
> +	  rtx_code code = GET_CODE (SET_SRC (PATTERN (use_insn)));
> +
> +	  if (GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_BIN_ARITH
> +	      || GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_COMM_ARITH
> +	      || GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_UNARY)
> +	    return false;
> +	}
> +     }
> +  return true;
> +}
> +
>  /* This function goes through all reaching defs of the source
>     of the candidate for elimination (CAND) and tries to combine
>     the extension with the definition instruction.  The changes
> @@ -770,6 +885,11 @@ combine_reaching_defs (ext_cand *cand, const_rtx set_pat, ext_state *state)
>  
>    state->defs_list.truncate (0);
>    state->copies_list.truncate (0);
> +  rtx orig_src = XEXP (SET_SRC (cand->expr),0);
> +
> +  if (abi_extension_candidate_p (cand->insn)
> +      && (!get_defs (cand->insn, orig_src, NULL)))
> +    return abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p (cand->insn);
>  
>    outcome = make_defs_and_copies_lists (cand->insn, set_pat, state);
>  
> @@ -1036,6 +1156,15 @@ combine_reaching_defs (ext_cand *cand, const_rtx set_pat, ext_state *state)
>          }
>      }
>  
> +  rtx insn_set = single_set (cand->insn);
> +
> +  machine_mode mode = (GET_MODE (XEXP (SET_SRC (insn_set), 0)));
> +
> +  bool promote_p = abi_target_promote_function_mode (mode);
> +
> +  if (promote_p)
> +    return true;
> +
>    if (merge_successful)
>      {
>        /* Commit the changes here if possible
> @@ -1112,26 +1241,34 @@ add_removable_extension (const_rtx expr, rtx_insn *insn,
>        rtx reg = XEXP (src, 0);
>        struct df_link *defs, *def;
>        ext_cand *cand;
> +      defs = get_defs (insn, reg, NULL);
>  
>        /* Zero-extension of an undefined value is partly defined (it's
>  	 completely undefined for sign-extension, though).  So if there exists
>  	 a path from the entry to this zero-extension that leaves this register
>  	 uninitialized, removing the extension could change the behavior of
>  	 correct programs.  So first, check it is not the case.  */
> -      if (code == ZERO_EXTEND && !bitmap_bit_p (init_regs, REGNO (reg)))
> +      if (!defs && abi_extension_candidate_argno_p (code, REGNO (reg)))
>  	{
> -	  if (dump_file)
> -	    {
> -	      fprintf (dump_file, "Cannot eliminate extension:\n");
> -	      print_rtl_single (dump_file, insn);
> -	      fprintf (dump_file, " because it can operate on uninitialized"
> -			          " data\n");
> -	    }
> +	  ext_cand e = {expr, code, mode, insn};
> +	  insn_list->safe_push (e);
>  	  return;
>  	}
>  
> +       if ((code == ZERO_EXTEND
> +	    && !bitmap_bit_p (init_regs, REGNO (reg))))
> +	  {
> +	    if (dump_file)
> +	      {
> +		fprintf (dump_file, "Cannot eliminate extension:\n");
> +		print_rtl_single (dump_file, insn);
> +		fprintf (dump_file, " because it can operate on uninitialized"
> +				    " data\n");
> +	      }
> +	    return;
> +	  }
> +
>        /* Second, make sure we can get all the reaching definitions.  */
> -      defs = get_defs (insn, reg, NULL);
>        if (!defs)
>  	{
>  	  if (dump_file)
> @@ -1321,7 +1458,8 @@ find_and_remove_re (void)
>  	      && (REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0))))
>  	    {
>                reinsn_copy_list.safe_push (curr_cand->insn);
> -              reinsn_copy_list.safe_push (state.defs_list[0]);
> +	      if (state.defs_list.length() != 0)
> +		reinsn_copy_list.safe_push (state.defs_list[0]);
>  	    }
>  	  reinsn_del_list.safe_push (curr_cand->insn);
>  	  state.modified[INSN_UID (curr_cand->insn)].deleted = 1;
> @@ -1342,24 +1480,27 @@ find_and_remove_re (void)
>       Remember that the memory reference will be changed to refer to the
>       destination of the extention.  So we're actually emitting a copy
>       from the new destination to the old destination.  */
> -  for (unsigned int i = 0; i < reinsn_copy_list.length (); i += 2)
> -    {
> -      rtx_insn *curr_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i];
> -      rtx_insn *def_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i + 1];
> -
> -      /* Use the mode of the destination of the defining insn
> -	 for the mode of the copy.  This is necessary if the
> -	 defining insn was used to eliminate a second extension
> -	 that was wider than the first.  */
> -      rtx sub_rtx = *get_sub_rtx (def_insn);
> -      rtx set = single_set (curr_insn);
> -      rtx new_dst = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
> -				 REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
> -      rtx new_src = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
> -				 REGNO (SET_DEST (set)));
> -      rtx new_set = gen_rtx_SET (new_dst, new_src);
> -      emit_insn_after (new_set, def_insn);
> -    }
> +   for (unsigned int i = 0; i < reinsn_copy_list.length (); i += 2)
> +     {
> +       rtx_insn *curr_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i];
> +
> +       if ((i+1) < reinsn_copy_list.length())
> +	 {
> +	   rtx_insn *def_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i + 1];
> +	   /* Use the mode of the destination of the defining insn
> +	      for the mode of the copy.  This is necessary if the
> +	      defining insn was used to eliminate a second extension
> +	      that was wider than the first.  */
> +	   rtx sub_rtx = *get_sub_rtx (def_insn);
> +	   rtx set = single_set (curr_insn);
> +	   rtx new_dst = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
> +				      REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
> +	   rtx new_src = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
> +				      REGNO (SET_DEST (set)));
> +	   rtx new_set = gen_rtx_SET (new_dst, new_src);
> +	   emit_insn_after (new_set, def_insn);
> +	}
> +      }
>  
>    /* Delete all useless extensions here in one sweep.  */
>    FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (reinsn_del_list, i, curr_insn)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..5a050df06ff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-options "-mcpu=power9 -O2" } */
> +
> +void *memset(void *b, int c, unsigned long len)
> +{
> +  unsigned long i;
> +
> +  for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> +    ((unsigned char *)b)[i] = c;
> +
> +   return b;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\mrlwinm\M" } } */
  

All:

Ok for trunk. Please review.

Thanks & Regards
Ajit

On 26/06/23 6:12 pm, Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches wrote:
> All:
> 
> Ok for trunk. Please review.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Ajit
> 
> On 01/06/23 10:53 am, Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hello All:
>>
>> This new version of patch 4 use improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined ABI interfaces.
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on power64-linux-gnu.
>>
>> Review comments incorporated.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> Ajit
>>
>> Improve ree pass for rs6000 target using defined abi interfaces
>>
>> For rs6000 target we see redundant zero and sign
>> extension and done to improve ree pass to eliminate
>> such redundant zero and sign extension using defined
>> ABI interfaces.
>>
>> 2023-06-01  Ajit Kumar Agarwal  <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 	* ree.cc (combine_reaching_defs): Use of  zero_extend and sign_extend
>> 	defined abi interfaces.
>> 	(add_removable_extension): Use of defined abi interfaces for no
>> 	reaching defs.
>> 	(abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p): New function.
>> 	(abi_extension_candidate_p): New function.
>> 	(abi_extension_candidate_argno_p): New function.
>> 	(abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p): New function.
>> 	(abi_target_promote_function_mode): New function.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>>         * g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
>> ---
>>  gcc/ree.cc                                    | 199 +++++++++++++++---
>>  .../g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C          |  13 ++
>>  2 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/ree.cc b/gcc/ree.cc
>> index fc04249fa84..2025a7c43da 100644
>> --- a/gcc/ree.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/ree.cc
>> @@ -514,7 +514,8 @@ get_uses (rtx_insn *insn, rtx reg)
>>      if (REGNO (DF_REF_REG (def)) == REGNO (reg))
>>        break;
>>  
>> -  gcc_assert (def != NULL);
>> +  if (def == NULL)
>> +    return NULL;
>>  
>>    ref_chain = DF_REF_CHAIN (def);
>>  
>> @@ -750,6 +751,120 @@ get_extended_src_reg (rtx src)
>>    return src;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Return TRUE if target mode is equal to source mode of zero_extend
>> +   or sign_extend otherwise false.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_target_promote_function_mode (machine_mode mode)
>> +{
>> +  int unsignedp;
>> +  machine_mode tgt_mode =
>> +    targetm.calls.promote_function_mode (NULL_TREE, mode, &unsignedp,
>> +					 NULL_TREE, 1);
>> +
>> +  if (tgt_mode == mode)
>> +    return true;
>> +  else
>> +    return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
>> +   an return  registers.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (rtx_insn *insn, int regno)
>> +{
>> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
>> +
>> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
>> +    return false;
>> +
>> +  if (FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P (regno))
>> +    return true;
>> +
>> +  return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return TRUE if reg source operand of zero_extend is argument registers
>> +   and not return registers and source and destination operand are same
>> +   and mode of source and destination operand are not same.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_extension_candidate_p (rtx_insn *insn)
>> +{
>> +  rtx set = single_set (insn);
>> +
>> +  if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (set)) !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
>> +    return false;
>> +
>> +  machine_mode ext_dst_mode = GET_MODE (SET_DEST (set));
>> +  rtx orig_src = XEXP (SET_SRC (set),0);
>> +
>> +  bool copy_needed
>> +    = (REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
>> +
>> +  if (!copy_needed && ext_dst_mode != GET_MODE (orig_src)
>> +      && FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (REGNO (orig_src))
>> +      && !abi_extension_candidate_return_reg_p (insn, REGNO (orig_src)))
>> +    return true;
>> +
>> +  return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn is zero extend and regno is
>> +   an argument registers.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_extension_candidate_argno_p (rtx_code code, int regno)
>> +{
>> +  if (code !=  ZERO_EXTEND)
>> +    return false;
>> +
>> +  if (FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (regno))
>> +    return true;
>> +
>> +  return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return TRUE if the candidate insn doesn't have defs and have
>> + * uses without RTX_BIN_ARITH/RTX_COMM_ARITH/RTX_UNARY rtx class.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p (rtx_insn *insn)
>> +{
>> +  if (side_effects_p (PATTERN (insn)))
>> +    return false;
>> +
>> +  struct df_link *uses
>> +    = get_uses (insn, SET_DEST (PATTERN (insn)));
>> +
>> +  if (!uses)
>> +    return false;
>> +
>> +  for (df_link *use = uses; use; use = use->next)
>> +    {
>> +      if (!use->ref)
>> +	return false;
>> +
>> +      if (BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn)
>> +	  != BLOCK_FOR_INSN (DF_REF_INSN (use->ref)))
>> +	return false;
>> +
>> +      rtx_insn *use_insn = DF_REF_INSN (use->ref);
>> +
>> +      if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (use_insn)) == SET)
>> +	{
>> +	  rtx_code code = GET_CODE (SET_SRC (PATTERN (use_insn)));
>> +
>> +	  if (GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_BIN_ARITH
>> +	      || GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_COMM_ARITH
>> +	      || GET_RTX_CLASS (code) == RTX_UNARY)
>> +	    return false;
>> +	}
>> +     }
>> +  return true;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /* This function goes through all reaching defs of the source
>>     of the candidate for elimination (CAND) and tries to combine
>>     the extension with the definition instruction.  The changes
>> @@ -770,6 +885,11 @@ combine_reaching_defs (ext_cand *cand, const_rtx set_pat, ext_state *state)
>>  
>>    state->defs_list.truncate (0);
>>    state->copies_list.truncate (0);
>> +  rtx orig_src = XEXP (SET_SRC (cand->expr),0);
>> +
>> +  if (abi_extension_candidate_p (cand->insn)
>> +      && (!get_defs (cand->insn, orig_src, NULL)))
>> +    return abi_handle_regs_without_defs_p (cand->insn);
>>  
>>    outcome = make_defs_and_copies_lists (cand->insn, set_pat, state);
>>  
>> @@ -1036,6 +1156,15 @@ combine_reaching_defs (ext_cand *cand, const_rtx set_pat, ext_state *state)
>>          }
>>      }
>>  
>> +  rtx insn_set = single_set (cand->insn);
>> +
>> +  machine_mode mode = (GET_MODE (XEXP (SET_SRC (insn_set), 0)));
>> +
>> +  bool promote_p = abi_target_promote_function_mode (mode);
>> +
>> +  if (promote_p)
>> +    return true;
>> +
>>    if (merge_successful)
>>      {
>>        /* Commit the changes here if possible
>> @@ -1112,26 +1241,34 @@ add_removable_extension (const_rtx expr, rtx_insn *insn,
>>        rtx reg = XEXP (src, 0);
>>        struct df_link *defs, *def;
>>        ext_cand *cand;
>> +      defs = get_defs (insn, reg, NULL);
>>  
>>        /* Zero-extension of an undefined value is partly defined (it's
>>  	 completely undefined for sign-extension, though).  So if there exists
>>  	 a path from the entry to this zero-extension that leaves this register
>>  	 uninitialized, removing the extension could change the behavior of
>>  	 correct programs.  So first, check it is not the case.  */
>> -      if (code == ZERO_EXTEND && !bitmap_bit_p (init_regs, REGNO (reg)))
>> +      if (!defs && abi_extension_candidate_argno_p (code, REGNO (reg)))
>>  	{
>> -	  if (dump_file)
>> -	    {
>> -	      fprintf (dump_file, "Cannot eliminate extension:\n");
>> -	      print_rtl_single (dump_file, insn);
>> -	      fprintf (dump_file, " because it can operate on uninitialized"
>> -			          " data\n");
>> -	    }
>> +	  ext_cand e = {expr, code, mode, insn};
>> +	  insn_list->safe_push (e);
>>  	  return;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +       if ((code == ZERO_EXTEND
>> +	    && !bitmap_bit_p (init_regs, REGNO (reg))))
>> +	  {
>> +	    if (dump_file)
>> +	      {
>> +		fprintf (dump_file, "Cannot eliminate extension:\n");
>> +		print_rtl_single (dump_file, insn);
>> +		fprintf (dump_file, " because it can operate on uninitialized"
>> +				    " data\n");
>> +	      }
>> +	    return;
>> +	  }
>> +
>>        /* Second, make sure we can get all the reaching definitions.  */
>> -      defs = get_defs (insn, reg, NULL);
>>        if (!defs)
>>  	{
>>  	  if (dump_file)
>> @@ -1321,7 +1458,8 @@ find_and_remove_re (void)
>>  	      && (REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0))))
>>  	    {
>>                reinsn_copy_list.safe_push (curr_cand->insn);
>> -              reinsn_copy_list.safe_push (state.defs_list[0]);
>> +	      if (state.defs_list.length() != 0)
>> +		reinsn_copy_list.safe_push (state.defs_list[0]);
>>  	    }
>>  	  reinsn_del_list.safe_push (curr_cand->insn);
>>  	  state.modified[INSN_UID (curr_cand->insn)].deleted = 1;
>> @@ -1342,24 +1480,27 @@ find_and_remove_re (void)
>>       Remember that the memory reference will be changed to refer to the
>>       destination of the extention.  So we're actually emitting a copy
>>       from the new destination to the old destination.  */
>> -  for (unsigned int i = 0; i < reinsn_copy_list.length (); i += 2)
>> -    {
>> -      rtx_insn *curr_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i];
>> -      rtx_insn *def_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i + 1];
>> -
>> -      /* Use the mode of the destination of the defining insn
>> -	 for the mode of the copy.  This is necessary if the
>> -	 defining insn was used to eliminate a second extension
>> -	 that was wider than the first.  */
>> -      rtx sub_rtx = *get_sub_rtx (def_insn);
>> -      rtx set = single_set (curr_insn);
>> -      rtx new_dst = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
>> -				 REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
>> -      rtx new_src = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
>> -				 REGNO (SET_DEST (set)));
>> -      rtx new_set = gen_rtx_SET (new_dst, new_src);
>> -      emit_insn_after (new_set, def_insn);
>> -    }
>> +   for (unsigned int i = 0; i < reinsn_copy_list.length (); i += 2)
>> +     {
>> +       rtx_insn *curr_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i];
>> +
>> +       if ((i+1) < reinsn_copy_list.length())
>> +	 {
>> +	   rtx_insn *def_insn = reinsn_copy_list[i + 1];
>> +	   /* Use the mode of the destination of the defining insn
>> +	      for the mode of the copy.  This is necessary if the
>> +	      defining insn was used to eliminate a second extension
>> +	      that was wider than the first.  */
>> +	   rtx sub_rtx = *get_sub_rtx (def_insn);
>> +	   rtx set = single_set (curr_insn);
>> +	   rtx new_dst = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
>> +				      REGNO (XEXP (SET_SRC (set), 0)));
>> +	   rtx new_src = gen_rtx_REG (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (sub_rtx)),
>> +				      REGNO (SET_DEST (set)));
>> +	   rtx new_set = gen_rtx_SET (new_dst, new_src);
>> +	   emit_insn_after (new_set, def_insn);
>> +	}
>> +      }
>>  
>>    /* Delete all useless extensions here in one sweep.  */
>>    FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (reinsn_del_list, i, curr_insn)
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..5a050df06ff
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/zext-elim-3.C
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +/* { dg-options "-mcpu=power9 -O2" } */
>> +
>> +void *memset(void *b, int c, unsigned long len)
>> +{
>> +  unsigned long i;
>> +
>> +  for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> +    ((unsigned char *)b)[i] = c;
>> +
>> +   return b;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\mrlwinm\M" } } */