Add 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-big-1.c' [PR105421] (was: amdgcn: Use FLAT addressing for all functions with pointer arguments [PR105421])

From c7ebee2378426eeca425ca5406af213a926f154c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:13:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-big-1.c' [PR105421]

After commit r13-3404-g7c55755d4c760de326809636531478fd7419e1e5
"amdgcn: Use FLAT addressing for all functions with pointer arguments [PR105421]",
"big" private data now works for GCN offloading, too.

	PR target/105421
	libgomp/
	* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-big-1.c: New.
---
 .../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-big-1.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-big-1.c

diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-big-1.c b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-big-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c0e8db0c894
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-big-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ 
+/* Test "big" private data.  */
+
+/* { dg-additional-options -fno-inline } for stable results regarding OpenACC 'routine'.  */
+
+/* { dg-additional-options -fopt-info-all-omp }
+   { dg-additional-options --param=openacc-privatization=noisy }
+   { dg-additional-options -foffload=-fopt-info-all-omp }
+   { dg-additional-options -foffload=--param=openacc-privatization=noisy }
+   for testing/documenting aspects of that functionality.  */
+
+/* { dg-additional-options -Wopenacc-parallelism } for testing/documenting
+   aspects of that functionality.  */
+
+/* For GCN offloading compilation, we (expectedly) run into a
+   'gang-private data-share memory exhausted' error: the default
+   '-mgang-private-size' is too small.  Raise it so that 'uint32_t x[344]' plus
+   some internal-use data fits in:
+   { dg-additional-options -foffload-options=amdgcn-amdhsa=-mgang-private-size=1555 { target openacc_radeon_accel_selected } } */
+
+/* It's only with Tcl 8.5 (released in 2007) that "the variable 'varName'
+   passed to 'incr' may be unset, and in that case, it will be set to [...]",
+   so to maintain compatibility with earlier Tcl releases, we manually
+   initialize counter variables:
+   { dg-line l_dummy[variable c_compute 0 c_loop 0] }
+   { dg-message dummy {} { target iN-VAl-Id } l_dummy } to avoid
+   "WARNING: dg-line var l_dummy defined, but not used".  */
+
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+
+/* Based on 'private-variables.c:loop_g_5'.  */
+
+/* To demonstrate PR105421 "GCN offloading, raised '-mgang-private-size':
+   'HSA_STATUS_ERROR_MEMORY_APERTURE_VIOLATION'", a 'struct' indirection, for
+   example, has been necessary in combination with a separate routine.  */
+
+struct data
+{
+  uint32_t *x;
+  uint32_t *arr;
+  uint32_t i;
+};
+
+#pragma acc routine worker
+static void
+loop_g_5_r(struct data *data)
+{
+  uint32_t *x = data->x;
+  uint32_t *arr = data->arr;
+  uint32_t i = data->i;
+
+#pragma acc loop /* { dg-line l_loop[incr c_loop] } */
+  /* { dg-note {variable 'j' in 'private' clause isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop$c_loop } */
+  /* { dg-optimized {assigned OpenACC worker vector loop parallelism} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop$c_loop } */
+  for (int j = 0; j < 320; j++)
+    arr[i * 320 + j] += x[(i * 320 + j) % 344];
+}
+
+void loop_g_5()
+{
+  uint32_t x[344], i, arr[320 * 320];
+
+  for (i = 0; i < 320 * 320; i++)
+    arr[i] = i;
+
+  #pragma acc parallel copy(arr)
+  {
+    #pragma acc loop gang private(x) /* { dg-line l_loop[incr c_loop] } */
+    /* { dg-note {variable 'x' in 'private' clause is candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop$c_loop }
+       { dg-note {variable 'x' ought to be adjusted for OpenACC privatization level: 'gang'} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop$c_loop }
+       { dg-note {variable 'x' adjusted for OpenACC privatization level: 'gang'} {} { target { ! openacc_host_selected } } l_loop$c_loop } */
+    /* { dg-note {variable 'i' in 'private' clause isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop$c_loop } */
+    /* { dg-note {variable 'data' declared in block is candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop$c_loop }
+       { dg-note {variable 'data' ought to be adjusted for OpenACC privatization level: 'gang'} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop$c_loop }
+       { dg-note {variable 'data' adjusted for OpenACC privatization level: 'gang'} {} { target { ! openacc_host_selected } } l_loop$c_loop } */
+    /* { dg-note {variable 'j' declared in block isn't candidate for adjusting OpenACC privatization level: not addressable} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop$c_loop } */
+    /* { dg-optimized {assigned OpenACC gang loop parallelism} {} { target *-*-* } l_loop$c_loop } */
+    for (i = 0; i < 320; i++)
+      {
+        for (int j = 0; j < 344; j++)
+	  x[j] = j * (2 + i);
+
+	struct data data = { x, arr, i };
+	loop_g_5_r(&data); /* { dg-line l_compute[incr c_compute] } */
+	/* { dg-optimized {assigned OpenACC worker vector loop parallelism} {} { target *-*-* } l_compute$c_compute } */
+      }
+  }
+
+  for (i = 0; i < 320 * 320; i++)
+    assert(arr[i] == i + (i % 344) * (2 + (i / 320)));
+}
+
+
+int main ()
+{
+  loop_g_5();
+
+  return 0;
+}
-- 
2.35.1