[committed] Fix liveness computation for shift/rotate counts in ext-dce
Checks
Commit Message
So as I've noted before I believe the control flow in ext-dce.cc is
horribly messy. While investigating a fix for 115877 I came across
another problem related to control flow handling.
Specifically, if we have an binary op which implies the 2nd operand is
fully live, then we'd actually fail to mark that operand as live.
We essentially broke out of the loop which was supposed to be safe. But
Y was a REG and if Y is a REG or CONST_INT we skip sub-rtxs and thus
failed to process that operand (the shift count) at all.
Rather than muck around with control flow, we can just set all the bits
as live in DST_MASK and let normal processing continue. With all the
bits live IN DST_MASK all the bits implied by the mode of the argument
will also be live.
No testcase.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86. Pushing to the trunk.
jeff
commit b31b8af807f5459674b0b310cb62a5bc81b676e7
Author: Jeff Law <jlaw@ventanamicro.com>
Date: Mon Jul 15 18:15:33 2024 -0600
Fix liveness computation for shift/rotate counts in ext-dce
So as I've noted before I believe the control flow in ext-dce.cc is horribly
messy. While investigating a fix for 115877 I came across another problem
related to control flow handling.
Specifically, if we have an binary op which implies the 2nd operand is fully
live, then we'd actually fail to mark that operand as live.
We essentially broke out of the loop which was supposed to be safe. But Y was
a REG and if Y is a REG or CONST_INT we skip sub-rtxs and thus failed to
process that operand (the shift count) at all.
Rather than muck around with control flow, we can just set all the bits as live
in DST_MASK and let normal processing continue. With all the bits live IN
DST_MASK all the bits implied by the mode of the argument will also be live.
No testcase.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86. Pushing to the trunk.
gcc/
* ext-dce.cc (ext_dce_process_uses): Simplify control flow and fix
liveness computation for shift/rotate counts.
@@ -632,10 +632,11 @@ ext_dce_process_uses (rtx_insn *insn, rtx obj, bitmap live_tmp)
else if (!CONSTANT_P (y))
break;
- /* We might have (ashift (const_int 1) (reg...)) */
- /* XXX share this logic with code below. */
+ /* We might have (ashift (const_int 1) (reg...))
+ By setting dst_mask we can continue iterating on the
+ the next operand and it will be considered fully live. */
if (binop_implies_op2_fully_live (GET_CODE (src)))
- break;
+ dst_mask = -1;
/* If this was anything but a binary operand, break the inner
loop. This is conservatively correct as it will cause the