Fortran: reject SAVE of a COMMON in a BLOCK construct [PR119199]
Commit Message
Dear all,
here's a patch that fixes a 15-regression (NULL pointer dereference)
and implements a missed check of SAVE of a COMMON in a BLOCK construct.
Two separate testcases, as the respective error messages occur at
different stages in the frontend.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
Comments
Hi Harald,
> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Looks good to me.
Thanks for the patch!
Best regards
Thomas
Hi Thomas!
Am 11.03.25 um 07:13 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
> Hi Harald,
>
>> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Thanks for the patch!
Committed as r15-7966-g5e9f71254a5276.
Thanks for the review!
> Best regards
>
> Thomas
>
>
From 7e8f9a0d625f1c66014f71775190218b8ac51e4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 22:24:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: reject SAVE of a COMMON in a BLOCK construct
[PR119199]
PR fortran/119199
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* decl.cc (gfc_match_save): Reject SAVE statement of a COMMON block
when in a BLOCK construct.
* trans-common.cc (translate_common): Avoid NULL pointer dereference.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/common_30.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/common_31.f90: New test.
---
gcc/fortran/decl.cc | 9 +++++++++
gcc/fortran/trans-common.cc | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_30.f90 | 10 ++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_31.f90 | 15 +++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_30.f90
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_31.f90
@@ -9795,6 +9795,15 @@ gfc_match_save (void)
if (m == MATCH_NO)
goto syntax;
+ /* F2023:C1108: A SAVE statement in a BLOCK construct shall contain a
+ saved-entity-list that does not specify a common-block-name. */
+ if (gfc_current_state () == COMP_BLOCK)
+ {
+ gfc_error ("SAVE of COMMON block %qs at %C is not allowed "
+ "in a BLOCK construct", n);
+ return MATCH_ERROR;
+ }
+
c = gfc_get_common (n, 0);
c->saved = 1;
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ translate_common (gfc_common_head *common, gfc_symbol *var_list)
align = 1;
saw_equiv = false;
- if (var_list->attr.omp_allocate)
+ if (var_list && var_list->attr.omp_allocate)
gfc_error ("Sorry, !$OMP allocate for COMMON block variable %qs at %L "
"not supported", common->name, &common->where);
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR fortran/119199
+!
+! One cannot SAVE an undefined COMMON block
+!
+! Contributed by David Binderman
+
+program main
+ save /argmnt1/ ! { dg-error "does not exist" }
+end
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR fortran/119199 - reject SAVE of a COMMON in a BLOCK construct
+!
+! F2023:C1108: A SAVE statement in a BLOCK construct shall contain a
+! saved-entity-list that does not specify a common-block-name.
+!
+! Contributed by David Binderman
+
+program main
+ real r
+ common /argmnt2/ r
+ block
+ save /argmnt2/ ! { dg-error "not allowed in a BLOCK construct" }
+ end block
+end
--
2.43.0