diff mbox series

[Ada] Deal with derived record types in Has_Compatible_Representation

Message ID 20220517082735.GA1088759@adacore.com
State Committed
Commit d678717ab233610588ae15fcddeb20b39ac7daf5
Headers
Series [Ada] Deal with derived record types in Has_Compatible_Representation |

Commit Message

Pierre-Marie de Rodat May 17, 2022, 8:27 a.m. UTC 
  More precisely, untagged record types, as tagged record types are already
handled by the predicate.  If the derived type has not been given its own
representation clause, then the representations are the same.

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk

gcc/ada/

	* sem_ch13.adb (Has_Compatible_Representation): Return true for
	derived untagged record types without representation clause.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
@@ -13539,6 +13539,16 @@  package body Sem_Ch13 is
          if Is_Packed (T1) /= Is_Packed (T2) then
             return False;
 
+         --  If the operand type is derived from the target type and no clause
+         --  has been given after the derivation, then the representations are
+         --  the same since the derived type inherits that of the parent type.
+
+         elsif Is_Derived_Type (T2)
+           and then Etype (T2) = T1
+           and then not Has_Record_Rep_Clause (T2)
+         then
+            return True;
+
          --  Otherwise we must check components. Typ2 maybe a constrained
          --  subtype with fewer components, so we compare the components
          --  of the base types.