rewrite undefined overflow to defined in ifcombine
Commit Message
When we make stmts to execute unconditionally in ifcombine we have
to make sure to rewrite stmts that can invoke undefined behavior
on overflow into a form with defined overflow. That's possible
for all but signed division for which we have to avoid the transform.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
This was developed as not working solution to fix PR105142 and
I do not have a testcase that experiences wrong-code (but I only
tried for about 10 minutes to construct one). Still the problem
is obviously latent and we should fix it.
Thus - OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Richard.
2022-04-04 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
* tree-ssa-ifcombine.cc (bb_no_side_effects_p): Avoid executing
divisions with undefined overflow unconditionally.
(pass_tree_ifcombine::execute): Rewrite stmts with undefined
overflow to defined.
---
gcc/tree-ssa-ifcombine.cc | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
Comments
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 11:44:59AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> When we make stmts to execute unconditionally in ifcombine we have
> to make sure to rewrite stmts that can invoke undefined behavior
> on overflow into a form with defined overflow. That's possible
> for all but signed division for which we have to avoid the transform.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> This was developed as not working solution to fix PR105142 and
> I do not have a testcase that experiences wrong-code (but I only
> tried for about 10 minutes to construct one). Still the problem
> is obviously latent and we should fix it.
>
> Thus - OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
> 2022-04-04 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
>
> * tree-ssa-ifcombine.cc (bb_no_side_effects_p): Avoid executing
> divisions with undefined overflow unconditionally.
> (pass_tree_ifcombine::execute): Rewrite stmts with undefined
> overflow to defined.
LGTM.
Jakub
@@ -125,10 +125,26 @@ bb_no_side_effects_p (basic_block bb)
if (is_gimple_debug (stmt))
continue;
+ gassign *ass;
+ enum tree_code rhs_code;
if (gimple_has_side_effects (stmt)
|| gimple_uses_undefined_value_p (stmt)
|| gimple_could_trap_p (stmt)
|| gimple_vuse (stmt)
+ /* We need to rewrite stmts with undefined overflow to use
+ unsigned arithmetic but cannot do so for signed division. */
+ || ((ass = dyn_cast <gassign *> (stmt))
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_lhs (ass)))
+ && TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_lhs (ass)))
+ && ((rhs_code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (ass)), true)
+ && (rhs_code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR
+ || rhs_code == CEIL_DIV_EXPR
+ || rhs_code == FLOOR_DIV_EXPR
+ || rhs_code == ROUND_DIV_EXPR)
+ /* We cannot use expr_not_equal_to since we'd have to restrict
+ flow-sensitive info to whats known at the outer if. */
+ && (TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs2 (ass)) != INTEGER_CST
+ || !integer_minus_onep (gimple_assign_rhs2 (ass))))
/* const calls don't match any of the above, yet they could
still have some side-effects - they could contain
gimple_could_trap_p statements, like floating point
@@ -847,6 +863,19 @@ pass_tree_ifcombine::execute (function *fun)
/* Clear range info from all stmts in BB which is now executed
conditional on a always true/false condition. */
reset_flow_sensitive_info_in_bb (bb);
+ for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi);
+ gsi_next (&gsi))
+ {
+ gassign *ass = dyn_cast <gassign *> (gsi_stmt (gsi));
+ if (!ass)
+ continue;
+ tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (ass);
+ if ((INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs))
+ || POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs)))
+ && arith_code_with_undefined_signed_overflow
+ (gimple_assign_rhs_code (ass)))
+ rewrite_to_defined_overflow (ass, true);
+ }
cfg_changed |= true;
}
}