From patchwork Thu Apr 21 21:28:13 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Segher Boessenkool X-Patchwork-Id: 53105 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9481938515FF for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 21:30:06 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from gcc1-power7.osuosl.org (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org [140.211.15.137]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E903856244 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 21:28:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 79E903856244 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=gcc1-power7.osuosl.org Received: by gcc1-power7.osuosl.org (Postfix, from userid 10019) id 234211240607; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 21:28:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Segher Boessenkool To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 3/3] rs6000/testsuite: xfail bswap-brw.c Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 21:28:13 +0000 Message-Id: <04fda9f5682df52bbc35d18861caead110d0d8bf.1650575998.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_SHORT, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Segher Boessenkool , dje.gcc@gmail.com Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" This testcase does not generate anywhere near optimal code for 32-bit code. For p10 it actually now fails this testcase, after the previous patch. Let's xfail it. 2022-04-21 Segher Boessenkool gcc/testsuite/ PR target/103197 PR target/102146 * gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c: Add xfail on scan-assembler for -m32. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c index b3f923eea848..0ed2a7bd1d25 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c @@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ bswap_int_dbl (unsigned int a) /* Force the value to be loaded into a vector register. */ __asm__ (" # %x0" : "+wa" (b)); - /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\mxxbrw\M} } } */ + /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\mxxbrw\M} {xfail {has_arch_pwr10 && {! has_arch_ppc64}}} } } */ return (double) __builtin_bswap32 (b); }