PR c++/84964: Middle-end patch to expand_call for ICE after sorry.
Commit Message
This patch resolves PR c++/84964 which is an ICE in the middle-end after
emitting a "sorry, unimplemented" message, and is a regression from
earlier releases of GCC. This issue is that after encountering a
function call requiring an unreasonable amount of stack space, the
code continues and falls foul of an assert checking that stack pointer
has been correctly updated. The fix is to (locally) consider aborted
function calls as "no return", which skips this downstream sanity check.
This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check with no new failures. Ok for mainline?
2022-02-28 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
gcc/ChangeLog
PR c++/84964
* calls.cc (expand_call): Ignore stack adjustments after sorry.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR c++/84964
* g++.dg/pr84964.C: New test case.
Thanks in advance,
Roger
--
Comments
On 2/28/22 03:52, Roger Sayle wrote:
>
> This patch resolves PR c++/84964 which is an ICE in the middle-end after
> emitting a "sorry, unimplemented" message, and is a regression from
> earlier releases of GCC. This issue is that after encountering a
> function call requiring an unreasonable amount of stack space, the
> code continues and falls foul of an assert checking that stack pointer
> has been correctly updated. The fix is to (locally) consider aborted
> function calls as "no return", which skips this downstream sanity check.
>
> This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
> and make -k check with no new failures. Ok for mainline?
>
>
> 2022-02-28 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
> PR c++/84964
> * calls.cc (expand_call): Ignore stack adjustments after sorry.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> PR c++/84964
> * g++.dg/pr84964.C: New test case.
Again I'd prefer to have the test in a subdirectory, though which one is
less clear; either opt or other, I guess. OK with that change.
@@ -3447,6 +3447,8 @@ expand_call (tree exp, rtx target, int ignore)
>= (1 << (HOST_BITS_PER_INT - 2)))
{
sorry ("passing too large argument on stack");
+ /* Don't worry about stack clean-up. */
+ flags |= ECF_NORETURN;
continue;
}
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+struct a {
+ short b : -1ULL; // { dg-warning "exceeds its type" }
+};
+void c(...) { c(a()); } // { dg-message "sorry, unimplemented" }
+