| Message ID | bmm.hj3g79m88u.gcc.gcc-TEST.clyon.169.1.0@forge-stage.sourceware.org |
|---|---|
| Headers |
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-bounces~patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548D14BA540B for <patchwork@sourceware.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 09:41:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 548D14BA540B X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from forge-stage.sourceware.org (vm08.sourceware.org [38.145.34.39]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC814BA23EA for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 08:59:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8AC814BA23EA Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=forge-stage.sourceware.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=forge-stage.sourceware.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 8AC814BA23EA Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=38.145.34.39 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1780390767; cv=none; b=Ysmq87Fe+b6CM22JG+JDXR97Xbwcz3DGZhloh7mOG9UQi6BUL8RcrPly9PdZfYZ4svuohlubFvPfbdYCw5fAIOVEaMl7Z9+Rh+ri2NqvD5++Ia9SygkSwES6z58w9eLaXMsD5KwWArruhNFbaqUTUdf6i9VCIHESl6eDJaADTvE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1780390767; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NGhQ2SDU0/vgRHOkD4nKtpmwGv811zqmpKJC7ktbbtU=; h=From:Date:Subject:To:Message-ID; b=RLyyfTM6pXL8lGHG8jLwUP5gyvXajeo95u3ENy7Pfvpl3O89vw5AbAv80Tf/Z3qLZwjtaSfwG9dIxp+mGcmTwU5X7ophujgpnatvtU41j4/WYbtBNQvraZmri88hDvMP+Y4rj6fxXqkEHlYnS/hqzR+6YiagyREY4K9XS2LujT8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8AC814BA23EA Received: from forge-stage.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by forge-stage.sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6092642A01 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:59:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Christophe Lyon via Sourceware Forge <forge-bot+clyon@forge-stage.sourceware.org> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:58:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v1 0/1] top-level: Split forgejo format checks To: gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> Message-ID: <bmm.hj3g79m88u.gcc.gcc-TEST.clyon.169.1.0@forge-stage.sourceware.org> X-Mailer: batrachomyomachia X-Requested-Reviewer: rdfm X-Pull-Request-Organization: gcc X-Pull-Request-Repository: gcc-TEST X-Pull-Request: https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/169 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, clyon@gcc.gnu.org Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces~patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org |
| Series |
top-level: Split forgejo format checks
|
|
Message
Christophe Lyon via Sourceware Forge
June 2, 2026, 8:58 a.m. UTC
Hi gcc-patches mailing list, Christophe Lyon via Sourceware Forge <forge-bot+clyon@forge-stage.sourceware.org> has requested that the following forgejo pull request be published on the mailing list. Created on: 2026-06-02 08:43:51+00:00 Latest update: 2026-06-02 08:58:28+00:00 Changes: 1 changed files, 18 additions, 15 deletions Head revision: clyon/gcc-TEST ref forgejo-split-format-checks commit bd7a534847b5eb2933ff356c99bd6ecbd80a2279 Base revision: gcc/gcc-TEST ref trunk commit cfb945957ee9acd561f71e592221e227c140cfe4 r17-1071-gcfb945957ee9ac Merge base: cfb945957ee9acd561f71e592221e227c140cfe4 Full diff url: https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/169.diff Discussion: https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/169 Requested Reviewers: rdfm Since contrib/check_GNU_style.py has lots of false positives, it is causing the forgejo CI format-checks workflow to fail too frequently. To make it clearer, split the current checks (check_GNU_style.py and git_check_commit.py) so that we clearly see which one passes and which one passes in the forge UI. ChangeLog: * .forgejo/workflows/format-checks.yaml: Split format checks into GNU-style-check and ChangeLog-format-check. Changed files: - M: .forgejo/workflows/format-checks.yaml Christophe Lyon (1): top-level: Split forgejo format checks .forgejo/workflows/format-checks.yaml | 33 +++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)