[v3] x86/disasm: do not use format string without format specifiers
Checks
| Context |
Check |
Description |
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm |
success
|
Build passed
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_binutils_build--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Build passed
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_binutils_check--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Test passed
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm |
success
|
Test passed
|
Commit Message
Fixes PR binutils/34168: build failure with -Werror=format-security.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34168
Signed-off-by: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@obs.cr>
---
v3: Rebase and reword commit message
v2: Update commit message to reference Bugzilla
opcodes/i386-dis.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On Sun, May 24, 2026 at 12:09 PM Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@obs.cr> wrote:
>
> Fixes PR binutils/34168: build failure with -Werror=format-security.
>
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34168
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@obs.cr>
> ---
> v3: Rebase and reword commit message
> v2: Update commit message to reference Bugzilla
> opcodes/i386-dis.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/opcodes/i386-dis.c b/opcodes/i386-dis.c
> index 3c5f173648a..db1e4f7a7d5 100644
> --- a/opcodes/i386-dis.c
> +++ b/opcodes/i386-dis.c
> @@ -10375,7 +10375,7 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, disassemble_info *info, int intel_syntax)
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_OPERANDS; i++)
> if (ins.op_index[i] != -1 && ins.op_riprel[i])
> {
> - i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_comment_start, sep);
> + i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_comment_start, "%s", sep);
> sep = ", ";
> (*info->print_address_func)
> ((bfd_vma)(ins.start_pc + (ins.codep - ins.start_codep)
> @@ -10384,7 +10384,7 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, disassemble_info *info, int intel_syntax)
> }
> else if (*ins.cm_out[i])
> {
> - i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_comment_start, sep);
> + i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_comment_start, "%s", sep);
> sep = ", ";
> i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_symbol, "%s", ins.cm_out[i]);
> }
> --
> 2.49.0
>
I pushed it for you.
Thanks.
@@ -10375,7 +10375,7 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, disassemble_info *info, int intel_syntax)
for (i = 0; i < MAX_OPERANDS; i++)
if (ins.op_index[i] != -1 && ins.op_riprel[i])
{
- i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_comment_start, sep);
+ i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_comment_start, "%s", sep);
sep = ", ";
(*info->print_address_func)
((bfd_vma)(ins.start_pc + (ins.codep - ins.start_codep)
@@ -10384,7 +10384,7 @@ print_insn (bfd_vma pc, disassemble_info *info, int intel_syntax)
}
else if (*ins.cm_out[i])
{
- i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_comment_start, sep);
+ i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_comment_start, "%s", sep);
sep = ", ";
i386_dis_printf (info, dis_style_symbol, "%s", ins.cm_out[i]);
}