[4/5] gdb: remove copy_inferior_target_desc_info

  This function is now trivial, we can just copy inferior::tdesc_info
where needed.

Change-Id: I25185e2cd4ba1ef24a822d9e0eebec6e611d54d6
---
 gdb/inferior.c            |  2 +-
 gdb/infrun.c              |  4 ++--
 gdb/target-descriptions.c | 11 -----------
 gdb/target-descriptions.h |  7 -------
 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
  

Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

> This function is now trivial, we can just copy inferior::tdesc_info
> where needed.

I should look ahead before commenting on earlier patches :)

Thanks,
Andrew


>
> Change-Id: I25185e2cd4ba1ef24a822d9e0eebec6e611d54d6
> ---
>  gdb/inferior.c            |  2 +-
>  gdb/infrun.c              |  4 ++--
>  gdb/target-descriptions.c | 11 -----------
>  gdb/target-descriptions.h |  7 -------
>  4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/inferior.c b/gdb/inferior.c
> index dfe523664de0..65863440b9c0 100644
> --- a/gdb/inferior.c
> +++ b/gdb/inferior.c
> @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ clone_inferior_command (const char *args, int from_tty)
>        /* If the original inferior had a user specified target
>  	 description, make the clone use it too.  */
>        if (target_desc_info_from_user_p (&inf->tdesc_info))
> -	copy_inferior_target_desc_info (inf, orginf);
> +	inf->tdesc_info = orginf->tdesc_info;
>  
>        clone_program_space (pspace, orginf->pspace);
>  
> diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
> index edfb5ab0a91f..87ab73c47a4f 100644
> --- a/gdb/infrun.c
> +++ b/gdb/infrun.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ holding the child stopped.  Try \"set detach-on-fork\" or \
>  	  child_inf->attach_flag = parent_inf->attach_flag;
>  	  copy_terminal_info (child_inf, parent_inf);
>  	  child_inf->gdbarch = parent_inf->gdbarch;
> -	  copy_inferior_target_desc_info (child_inf, parent_inf);
> +	  child_inf->tdesc_info = parent_inf->tdesc_info;
>  
>  	  child_inf->symfile_flags = SYMFILE_NO_READ;
>  
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ holding the child stopped.  Try \"set detach-on-fork\" or \
>        child_inf->attach_flag = parent_inf->attach_flag;
>        copy_terminal_info (child_inf, parent_inf);
>        child_inf->gdbarch = parent_inf->gdbarch;
> -      copy_inferior_target_desc_info (child_inf, parent_inf);
> +      child_inf->tdesc_info = parent_inf->tdesc_info;
>  
>        if (has_vforked)
>  	{
> diff --git a/gdb/target-descriptions.c b/gdb/target-descriptions.c
> index 0561a8098c5c..6defd5bbe863 100644
> --- a/gdb/target-descriptions.c
> +++ b/gdb/target-descriptions.c
> @@ -459,17 +459,6 @@ target_desc_info_from_user_p (struct target_desc_info *info)
>    return info != nullptr && !info->filename.empty ();
>  }
>  
> -/* See target-descriptions.h.  */
> -
> -void
> -copy_inferior_target_desc_info (struct inferior *destinf, struct inferior *srcinf)
> -{
> -  struct target_desc_info *src = &srcinf->tdesc_info;
> -  struct target_desc_info *dest = &destinf->tdesc_info;
> -
> -  *dest = *src;
> -}
> -
>  /* The string manipulated by the "set tdesc filename ..." command.  */
>  
>  static std::string tdesc_filename_cmd_string;
> diff --git a/gdb/target-descriptions.h b/gdb/target-descriptions.h
> index c337c177c8e8..b835e144c680 100644
> --- a/gdb/target-descriptions.h
> +++ b/gdb/target-descriptions.h
> @@ -48,13 +48,6 @@ void target_clear_description (void);
>  
>  const struct target_desc *target_current_description (void);
>  
> -/* Copy inferior target description data.  Used for example when
> -   handling (v)forks, where child's description is the same as the
> -   parent's, since the child really is a copy of the parent.  */
> -
> -void copy_inferior_target_desc_info (struct inferior *destinf,
> -				     struct inferior *srcinf);
> -
>  /* Returns true if INFO indicates the target description had been
>     supplied by the user.  */
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.1
  

On 2/3/23 10:54, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
> 
>> This function is now trivial, we can just copy inferior::tdesc_info
>> where needed.
> 
> I should look ahead before commenting on earlier patches :)

Yeah, it happens to me all the time :).

Simon