Disable strncat test array-bounds warnings for GCC 8 [committed]
Commit Message
Some strncat tests fail to build with GCC 8 because of -Warray-bounds
warnings. These tests are deliberately test over-large size arguments
passed to strncat, and already disable -Wstringop-overflow warnings,
but now the warnings for these tests come under -Warray-bounds so that
option needs disabling for them as well, which this patch does (with
an update on the comments; the DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT call for
-Warray-bounds doesn't need to be conditional itself, because that
option is supported by all versions of GCC that can build glibc).
Tested compilation with build-many-glibcs.py for aarch64-linux-gnu.
Committed.
2017-12-18 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
* string/tester.c (test_strncat): Also disable -Warray-bounds
warnings for two tests.
Comments
On 12/18/2017 11:53 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> 2017-12-18 Joseph Myers<joseph@codesourcery.com>
>
> * string/tester.c (test_strncat): Also disable -Warray-bounds
> warnings for two tests.
Looks okay to me. Thanks.
Florian
@@ -387,9 +387,11 @@ test_strncat (void)
DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
/* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being larger than
- the size of the buffer; this is deliberately tested here.. */
+ the size of the buffer; this is deliberately tested here; GCC 8
+ gives a -Warray-bounds warning about this. */
DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow=");
#endif
+ DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Warray-bounds");
(void) strncat (one, two, 99);
DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
equal (one, "ghef", 5); /* Basic test encore. */
@@ -480,9 +482,11 @@ test_strncat (void)
#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
/* GCC 7 warns about the size passed to strncat being
larger than the size of the buffer; this is
- deliberately tested here.. */
+ deliberately tested here; GCC 8 gives a -Warray-bounds
+ warning about this. */
DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Wstringop-overflow=");
#endif
+ DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Warray-bounds");
check (strncat (buf1 + n2, buf2 + n1, ~((size_t) 0) - n4)
== buf1 + n2, ntest);
DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;