diff mbox series

[COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639)

Message ID 989507880.20632.1586212248570@poczta.nazwa.pl
State New
Headers show
Series [COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639) | expand

Commit Message

Rafal Luzynski April 6, 2020, 10:30 p.m. UTC
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Lu=C5=BCy=C5=84ski?=
<digitalfreak@lingonborough.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 23:45:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639)

Confirmed by CLDR and a native speaker: "abril" is more often used even
if "abrial" is also correct.  Both nominative (alt_mon) and genitive (mon)
cases are updated.
---
 localedata/locales/oc_FR | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Rafal Luzynski April 6, 2020, 10:48 p.m. UTC | #1
The question is: may I backport this fix [1] and even more important
the previous one [2] [3] to 2.31 so that the distros having their new
releases this quarter will have a chance to apply them?  Carlos?  Siddhesh?

Regards,

Rafal


[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-April/112592.html
[2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111973.html
[3] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111974.html
Rafal Luzynski April 30, 2020, 7:53 p.m. UTC | #2
7.04.2020 00:48 Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
wrote:
> 
> The question is: may I backport this fix [1] and even more important
> the previous one [2] [3] to 2.31 so that the distros having their new
> releases this quarter will have a chance to apply them?  Carlos?
>  Siddhesh?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rafal
> 
> 
> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-April/112592.html
> [2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111973.html
> [3] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111974.html

Ping...  "No" is a good answer if that's what you think.

Regards,

Rafal
Siddhesh Poyarekar May 1, 2020, 3:06 a.m. UTC | #3
On 01/05/20 01:23, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 7.04.2020 00:48 Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> The question is: may I backport this fix [1] and even more important
>> the previous one [2] [3] to 2.31 so that the distros having their new
>> releases this quarter will have a chance to apply them?  Carlos?
>>  Siddhesh?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Rafal
>>
>>
>> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-April/112592.html
>> [2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111973.html
>> [3] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111974.html
> 
> Ping...  "No" is a good answer if that's what you think.

Yes you may backport the fix.  In general you may backport fixes without
asking for consensus as long as it does not have an ABI impact and it
fixes a bug.

Siddhesh
Rafal Luzynski May 9, 2020, 3:40 p.m. UTC | #4
1.05.2020 05:06 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org> wrote:
> [...]
> Yes you may backport the fix.

Thank you, backported to 2.31 now.

> In general you may backport fixes without
> asking for consensus as long as it does not have an ABI impact and it
> fixes a bug.

I thought the policy was different and actually some of my patches had
been rejected from the backport.  Maybe the policy had been different
in the past.

Indeed, it fixes a bug (typo) and does not have an ABI impact and does
not increase the string width.

Regards,

Rafal
Florian Weimer May 9, 2020, 6:51 p.m. UTC | #5
* Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha:

> 1.05.2020 05:06 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org> wrote:
>> [...]
>> Yes you may backport the fix.
>
> Thank you, backported to 2.31 now.
>
>> In general you may backport fixes without
>> asking for consensus as long as it does not have an ABI impact and it
>> fixes a bug.
>
> I thought the policy was different and actually some of my patches had
> been rejected from the backport.  Maybe the policy had been different
> in the past.

The policy has not changed.

Some locale updates are more risky, with collation updates that may
cause silent corruption of database indices at the extreme end.  I
don't think we should do those in a stable release.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/localedata/locales/oc_FR b/localedata/locales/oc_FR
index 9d616abcdb..ba9377ed41 100644
--- a/localedata/locales/oc_FR
+++ b/localedata/locales/oc_FR
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@  abmon   "gen.";/
 alt_mon "geni<U00E8>r";/
         "febri<U00E8>r";/
         "mar<U00E7>";/
-        "abrial";/
+        "abril";/
         "mai";/
         "junh";/
         "julhet";/
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@  alt_mon "geni<U00E8>r";/
 mon     "de geni<U00E8>r";/
         "de febri<U00E8>r";/
         "de mar<U00E7>";/
-        "d<U2019>abrial";/
+        "d<U2019>abril";/
         "de mai";/
         "de junh";/
         "de julhet";/