diff mbox

[21/23] arm64: ilp32: introduce ilp32-specific handlers for sigframe and ucontext

Message ID 5752BCC8.7080205@huawei.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Zhang Jian(Bamvor) June 4, 2016, 11:34 a.m. UTC
Hi,

I found an issue of unwind with the following code. The correct backtrace
should be:
(gdb) where
#0 0x004004d0 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
#1 <signal handler called>
#2 func2 (num=0) at test_force3.c:22
#3 0x00400540 in func1 (num=1) at test_force3.c:28
#4 0x00400574 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffd7bc04) at test_force3.c:33

Without my patch, the backtrace is:
(gdb) where
#0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
#1 <signal handler called>
#2 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33

With my patch which fix the wrong frame pointer(setup_return calculate the offset
of fp through ilp32_sigframe instead of sigfreame), the backtrace is:
(gdb) where
#0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
#1 <signal handler called>
#2 func1 () at test_force3.c:28
#3 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33

I am not sure there is still some issue in kernel. But it seem that the gdb of ilp32
does not work correctly when unwind without framepointer.

The test code is:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>

void my_sig(int sig)
{
	printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
	*(int *)0 = 0x0;
}


void func2()
{
	*(int *)0 = 0x0;
}

void func1()
{
	func2();
}

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	signal(11, my_sig);
	func1();
	return 0;
}


The full patch is as follows:

 From 7e364a765097f57aed2d73f94c1688c2e7343e79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:30:05 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ilp32: fix for wrong fp offset when calculate the
  new fp

ILP32 define its own sigframe(ilp32_sigframe) because of the
difference uc_context. setup_return do not use ilp32 specific
sigframe to calculate the new offset of fp which lead to wrong
fp in signal handler. At this circumstance, gdb backtrace will miss
one item:
(gdb) where

It should be:
(gdb) where

The test code is as follows:

void my_sig(int sig)
{
         printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
         *(int *)0 = 0x0;
}

void func2(int num)
{
         printf("%s: %d\n", __FUNCTION__, num);
         *(int *)0 = 0x0;
         func2(num-1);
}

void func1(int num)
{
         printf("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
         func2(num - 1);
}

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
         signal(11, my_sig);
         func1(argc);
         return 0;
}

This patch fix this by passing the correct offset of fp to
setup_return.
Test pass on both ILP32 and LP64 in aarch64 EE.

Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
---
  arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h | 3 ++-
  arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c             | 9 +++++----
  arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c       | 4 ++--
  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Zhang Jian(Bamvor) June 12, 2016, 12:34 p.m. UTC | #1
ping

On 2016/6/4 19:34, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found an issue of unwind with the following code. The correct backtrace
> should be:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x004004d0 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 func2 (num=0) at test_force3.c:22
> #3 0x00400540 in func1 (num=1) at test_force3.c:28
> #4 0x00400574 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffd7bc04) at test_force3.c:33
>
> Without my patch, the backtrace is:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
>
> With my patch which fix the wrong frame pointer(setup_return calculate the offset
> of fp through ilp32_sigframe instead of sigfreame), the backtrace is:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 func1 () at test_force3.c:28
> #3 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
>
> I am not sure there is still some issue in kernel. But it seem that the gdb of ilp32
> does not work correctly when unwind without framepointer.
>
> The test code is:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <signal.h>
>
> void my_sig(int sig)
> {
>      printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
>      *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
>
>
> void func2()
> {
>      *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
>
> void func1()
> {
>      func2();
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
>      signal(11, my_sig);
>      func1();
>      return 0;
> }
>
>
> The full patch is as follows:
>
>  From 7e364a765097f57aed2d73f94c1688c2e7343e79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:30:05 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ilp32: fix for wrong fp offset when calculate the
>   new fp
>
> ILP32 define its own sigframe(ilp32_sigframe) because of the
> difference uc_context. setup_return do not use ilp32 specific
> sigframe to calculate the new offset of fp which lead to wrong
> fp in signal handler. At this circumstance, gdb backtrace will miss
> one item:
> (gdb) where
>
> It should be:
> (gdb) where
>
> The test code is as follows:
>
> void my_sig(int sig)
> {
>          printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
>          *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
>
> void func2(int num)
> {
>          printf("%s: %d\n", __FUNCTION__, num);
>          *(int *)0 = 0x0;
>          func2(num-1);
> }
>
> void func1(int num)
> {
>          printf("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
>          func2(num - 1);
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
>          signal(11, my_sig);
>          func1(argc);
>          return 0;
> }
>
> This patch fix this by passing the correct offset of fp to
> setup_return.
> Test pass on both ILP32 and LP64 in aarch64 EE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h | 3 ++-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c             | 9 +++++----
>   arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c       | 4 ++--
>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> index de93c71..a5d7b63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ int setup_sigcontex(struct sigcontext __user *uc_mcontext,
>               struct pt_regs *regs);
>   int restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs, struct sigcontext __user *sf);
>   void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> -            void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig);
> +            void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
> +            int usig);
>
>   #endif /* __ASM_SIGNAL_COMMON_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> index 038bebe..e66a6e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -256,14 +256,14 @@ static struct rt_sigframe __user *get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>   }
>
>   void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> -             void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig)
> +             void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
> +             int usig)
>   {
>       __sigrestore_t sigtramp;
>
>       regs->regs[0] = usig;
>       regs->sp = (unsigned long)frame;
> -    regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off +
> -        offsetof(struct sigframe, fp);
> +    regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off + fp_off;
>       regs->pc = (unsigned long)ka->sa.sa_handler;
>
>       if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER)
> @@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set,
>       err |= setup_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>       if (err == 0) {
>           setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
> -            offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
> +            offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig),
> +            offsetof(struct sigframe, fp), usig);
>           if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO) {
>               err |= copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info);
>               regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> index a8ea73e..9030f14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ static struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *ilp32_get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>       struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *frame;
>
>       sp = sp_top = sigsp(regs->sp, ksig);
> -
>       sp = (sp - sizeof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe)) & ~15;
>       frame = (struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *)sp;
>
> @@ -183,7 +182,8 @@ int ilp32_setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig,
>       err |= setup_ilp32_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>       if (err == 0) {
>           setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
> -                 offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
> +                 offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig),
> +                 offsetof(struct ilp32_sigframe, fp), usig);
>           regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
>           regs->regs[2] = (unsigned long)&frame->sig.uc;
>       }
Zhang Jian(Bamvor) June 12, 2016, 1:12 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On 2016/6/4 19:34, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found an issue of unwind with the following code. The correct backtrace
> should be:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x004004d0 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 func2 (num=0) at test_force3.c:22
> #3 0x00400540 in func1 (num=1) at test_force3.c:28
> #4 0x00400574 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffd7bc04) at test_force3.c:33
>
> Without my patch, the backtrace is:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
>
> With my patch which fix the wrong frame pointer(setup_return calculate the offset
> of fp through ilp32_sigframe instead of sigfreame), the backtrace is:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 func1 () at test_force3.c:28
> #3 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
>
> I am not sure there is still some issue in kernel. But it seem that the gdb of ilp32
> does not work correctly when unwind without framepointer.
I confirm that the reason why gdb could not unwind the func2 is gdb do not get the
correct offset of uc_mcontext.
And it seems that the kernel part is a reasonable fix for me.

Regards

Bamvor
>
> The test code is:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <signal.h>
>
> void my_sig(int sig)
> {
>      printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
>      *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
>
>
> void func2()
> {
>      *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
>
> void func1()
> {
>      func2();
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
>      signal(11, my_sig);
>      func1();
>      return 0;
> }
>
>
> The full patch is as follows:
>
>  From 7e364a765097f57aed2d73f94c1688c2e7343e79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:30:05 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ilp32: fix for wrong fp offset when calculate the
>   new fp
>
> ILP32 define its own sigframe(ilp32_sigframe) because of the
> difference uc_context. setup_return do not use ilp32 specific
> sigframe to calculate the new offset of fp which lead to wrong
> fp in signal handler. At this circumstance, gdb backtrace will miss
> one item:
> (gdb) where
>
> It should be:
> (gdb) where
>
> The test code is as follows:
>
> void my_sig(int sig)
> {
>          printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
>          *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
>
> void func2(int num)
> {
>          printf("%s: %d\n", __FUNCTION__, num);
>          *(int *)0 = 0x0;
>          func2(num-1);
> }
>
> void func1(int num)
> {
>          printf("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
>          func2(num - 1);
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
>          signal(11, my_sig);
>          func1(argc);
>          return 0;
> }
>
> This patch fix this by passing the correct offset of fp to
> setup_return.
> Test pass on both ILP32 and LP64 in aarch64 EE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h | 3 ++-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c             | 9 +++++----
>   arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c       | 4 ++--
>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> index de93c71..a5d7b63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ int setup_sigcontex(struct sigcontext __user *uc_mcontext,
>               struct pt_regs *regs);
>   int restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs, struct sigcontext __user *sf);
>   void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> -            void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig);
> +            void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
> +            int usig);
>
>   #endif /* __ASM_SIGNAL_COMMON_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> index 038bebe..e66a6e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -256,14 +256,14 @@ static struct rt_sigframe __user *get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>   }
>
>   void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> -             void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig)
> +             void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
> +             int usig)
>   {
>       __sigrestore_t sigtramp;
>
>       regs->regs[0] = usig;
>       regs->sp = (unsigned long)frame;
> -    regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off +
> -        offsetof(struct sigframe, fp);
> +    regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off + fp_off;
>       regs->pc = (unsigned long)ka->sa.sa_handler;
>
>       if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER)
> @@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set,
>       err |= setup_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>       if (err == 0) {
>           setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
> -            offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
> +            offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig),
> +            offsetof(struct sigframe, fp), usig);
>           if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO) {
>               err |= copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info);
>               regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> index a8ea73e..9030f14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ static struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *ilp32_get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>       struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *frame;
>
>       sp = sp_top = sigsp(regs->sp, ksig);
> -
>       sp = (sp - sizeof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe)) & ~15;
>       frame = (struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *)sp;
>
> @@ -183,7 +182,8 @@ int ilp32_setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig,
>       err |= setup_ilp32_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>       if (err == 0) {
>           setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
> -                 offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
> +                 offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig),
> +                 offsetof(struct ilp32_sigframe, fp), usig);
>           regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
>           regs->regs[2] = (unsigned long)&frame->sig.uc;
>       }
Yury Norov June 12, 2016, 5:44 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Bamvor,

Sorry, I missed this patch.

On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 07:34:32PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I found an issue of unwind with the following code. The correct backtrace
> should be:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x004004d0 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 func2 (num=0) at test_force3.c:22
> #3 0x00400540 in func1 (num=1) at test_force3.c:28
> #4 0x00400574 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffd7bc04) at test_force3.c:33
> 
> Without my patch, the backtrace is:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
> 
> With my patch which fix the wrong frame pointer(setup_return calculate the offset
> of fp through ilp32_sigframe instead of sigfreame), the backtrace is:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 func1 () at test_force3.c:28
> #3 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
> 
> I am not sure there is still some issue in kernel. But it seem that the gdb of ilp32
> does not work correctly when unwind without framepointer.
> 
> The test code is:
> 
> From 7e364a765097f57aed2d73f94c1688c2e7343e79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:30:05 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ilp32: fix for wrong fp offset when calculate the
>  new fp
> 
> ILP32 define its own sigframe(ilp32_sigframe) because of the
> difference uc_context. setup_return do not use ilp32 specific
> sigframe to calculate the new offset of fp which lead to wrong
> fp in signal handler. At this circumstance, gdb backtrace will miss
> one item:
> (gdb) where
> 
> It should be:
> (gdb) where
> 
> The test code is as follows:
> 
> void my_sig(int sig)
> {
>         printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
>         *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
> 
> void func2(int num)
> {
>         printf("%s: %d\n", __FUNCTION__, num);
>         *(int *)0 = 0x0;
>         func2(num-1);
> }
> 
> void func1(int num)
> {
>         printf("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
>         func2(num - 1);
> }
> 
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
>         signal(11, my_sig);
>         func1(argc);
>         return 0;
> }
> 
> This patch fix this by passing the correct offset of fp to
> setup_return.
> Test pass on both ILP32 and LP64 in aarch64 EE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h | 3 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c             | 9 +++++----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c       | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> index de93c71..a5d7b63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ int setup_sigcontex(struct sigcontext __user *uc_mcontext,
>  		    struct pt_regs *regs);
>  int restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs, struct sigcontext __user *sf);
>  void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> -			void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig);
> +			void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
> +			int usig); 
> 
>  #endif /* __ASM_SIGNAL_COMMON_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> index 038bebe..e66a6e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -256,14 +256,14 @@ static struct rt_sigframe __user *get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>  }
> 
>  void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> -			 void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig)
> +			 void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
> +			 int usig)
>  {
>  	__sigrestore_t sigtramp;
> 
>  	regs->regs[0] = usig;
>  	regs->sp = (unsigned long)frame;
> -	regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off +
> -		offsetof(struct sigframe, fp);
> +	regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off + fp_off;

I think you are right here. The only nitpick is what for we send 2
offsets just to add one to another inside setup_return()?
We can do like this:

        void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
        			 void __user *frame, off_t fp_off, int usig)
        {
        	__sigrestore_t sigtramp;
        
        	regs->regs[0] = usig;
        	regs->sp = (unsigned long)frame;
        	regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + fp_off;
                [...]
        }

Where fp_off calculation is done by caller. 

	setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
		offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig) + offsetof(struct sigframe, fp),
                usig);

For me it's more clear to understand what happens with this approach.
I don't think struct rt_sigframe will grow, but we can even introduce
some helper for it:
        #define RT_SIGFRAME_FP_POS (offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig) + offsetof(struct sigframe, fp))

If no objections, I'll apply your patch with my fix in next series.

>  	regs->pc = (unsigned long)ka->sa.sa_handler;
> 
>  	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER)
> @@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set,
>  	err |= setup_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>  	if (err == 0) {
>  		setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
> -			offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
> +			offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig),
> +			offsetof(struct sigframe, fp), usig);
>  		if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO) {
>  			err |= copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info);
>  			regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> index a8ea73e..9030f14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ static struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *ilp32_get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>  	struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *frame;
> 
>  	sp = sp_top = sigsp(regs->sp, ksig);
> -
>  	sp = (sp - sizeof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe)) & ~15;
>  	frame = (struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *)sp;
> 
> @@ -183,7 +182,8 @@ int ilp32_setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig,
>  	err |= setup_ilp32_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>  	if (err == 0) {
>  		setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
> -			     offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
> +			     offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig),
> +			     offsetof(struct ilp32_sigframe, fp), usig);
>  		regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
>  		regs->regs[2] = (unsigned long)&frame->sig.uc;
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.8.4.5
> 
> Regards
> 
> Bamvor
> 
>
Zhang Jian(Bamvor) June 16, 2016, 11:21 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi,

On 2016/6/13 1:44, Yury Norov wrote:
> Hi Bamvor,
>
> Sorry, I missed this patch.
>
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 07:34:32PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found an issue of unwind with the following code. The correct backtrace
>> should be:
>> (gdb) where
>> #0 0x004004d0 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
>> #1 <signal handler called>
>> #2 func2 (num=0) at test_force3.c:22
>> #3 0x00400540 in func1 (num=1) at test_force3.c:28
>> #4 0x00400574 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffd7bc04) at test_force3.c:33
>>
>> Without my patch, the backtrace is:
>> (gdb) where
>> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
>> #1 <signal handler called>
>> #2 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
>>
>> With my patch which fix the wrong frame pointer(setup_return calculate the offset
>> of fp through ilp32_sigframe instead of sigfreame), the backtrace is:
>> (gdb) where
>> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
>> #1 <signal handler called>
>> #2 func1 () at test_force3.c:28
>> #3 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
>>
>> I am not sure there is still some issue in kernel. But it seem that the gdb of ilp32
>> does not work correctly when unwind without framepointer.
>>
>> The test code is:
>>
>>  From 7e364a765097f57aed2d73f94c1688c2e7343e79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
>> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:30:05 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ilp32: fix for wrong fp offset when calculate the
>>   new fp
>>
>> ILP32 define its own sigframe(ilp32_sigframe) because of the
>> difference uc_context. setup_return do not use ilp32 specific
>> sigframe to calculate the new offset of fp which lead to wrong
>> fp in signal handler. At this circumstance, gdb backtrace will miss
>> one item:
>> (gdb) where
>>
>> It should be:
>> (gdb) where
>>
>> The test code is as follows:
>>
>> void my_sig(int sig)
>> {
>>          printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
>>          *(int *)0 = 0x0;
>> }
>>
>> void func2(int num)
>> {
>>          printf("%s: %d\n", __FUNCTION__, num);
>>          *(int *)0 = 0x0;
>>          func2(num-1);
>> }
>>
>> void func1(int num)
>> {
>>          printf("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
>>          func2(num - 1);
>> }
>>
>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>>          signal(11, my_sig);
>>          func1(argc);
>>          return 0;
>> }
>>
>> This patch fix this by passing the correct offset of fp to
>> setup_return.
>> Test pass on both ILP32 and LP64 in aarch64 EE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h | 3 ++-
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c             | 9 +++++----
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c       | 4 ++--
>>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
>> index de93c71..a5d7b63 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ int setup_sigcontex(struct sigcontext __user *uc_mcontext,
>>   		    struct pt_regs *regs);
>>   int restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs, struct sigcontext __user *sf);
>>   void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
>> -			void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig);
>> +			void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
>> +			int usig);
>>
>>   #endif /* __ASM_SIGNAL_COMMON_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
>> index 038bebe..e66a6e9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
>> @@ -256,14 +256,14 @@ static struct rt_sigframe __user *get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>>   }
>>
>>   void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
>> -			 void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig)
>> +			 void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
>> +			 int usig)
>>   {
>>   	__sigrestore_t sigtramp;
>>
>>   	regs->regs[0] = usig;
>>   	regs->sp = (unsigned long)frame;
>> -	regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off +
>> -		offsetof(struct sigframe, fp);
>> +	regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off + fp_off;
>
> I think you are right here. The only nitpick is what for we send 2
> offsets just to add one to another inside setup_return()?
> We can do like this:
>
>          void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
>          			 void __user *frame, off_t fp_off, int usig)
>          {
>          	__sigrestore_t sigtramp;
>
>          	regs->regs[0] = usig;
>          	regs->sp = (unsigned long)frame;
>          	regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + fp_off;
>                  [...]
>          }
>
> Where fp_off calculation is done by caller.
>
> 	setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
> 		offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig) + offsetof(struct sigframe, fp),
>                  usig);
>
> For me it's more clear to understand what happens with this approach.
> I don't think struct rt_sigframe will grow, but we can even introduce
> some helper for it:
>          #define RT_SIGFRAME_FP_POS (offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig) + offsetof(struct sigframe, fp))
>
> If no objections, I'll apply your patch with my fix in next series.
Sure. Thanks.

Regards

Bamvor
>
>>   	regs->pc = (unsigned long)ka->sa.sa_handler;
>>
>>   	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER)
>> @@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set,
>>   	err |= setup_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>>   	if (err == 0) {
>>   		setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
>> -			offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
>> +			offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig),
>> +			offsetof(struct sigframe, fp), usig);
>>   		if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO) {
>>   			err |= copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info);
>>   			regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
>> index a8ea73e..9030f14 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
>> @@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ static struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *ilp32_get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>>   	struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *frame;
>>
>>   	sp = sp_top = sigsp(regs->sp, ksig);
>> -
>>   	sp = (sp - sizeof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe)) & ~15;
>>   	frame = (struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *)sp;
>>
>> @@ -183,7 +182,8 @@ int ilp32_setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig,
>>   	err |= setup_ilp32_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>>   	if (err == 0) {
>>   		setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
>> -			     offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
>> +			     offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig),
>> +			     offsetof(struct ilp32_sigframe, fp), usig);
>>   		regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
>>   		regs->regs[2] = (unsigned long)&frame->sig.uc;
>>   	}
>> --
>> 1.8.4.5
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bamvor
>>
>>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
index de93c71..a5d7b63 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@  int setup_sigcontex(struct sigcontext __user *uc_mcontext,
  		    struct pt_regs *regs);
  int restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs, struct sigcontext __user *sf);
  void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
-			void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig);
+			void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
+			int usig);

  #endif /* __ASM_SIGNAL_COMMON_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
index 038bebe..e66a6e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -256,14 +256,14 @@  static struct rt_sigframe __user *get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
  }

  void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
-			 void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig)
+			 void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
+			 int usig)
  {
  	__sigrestore_t sigtramp;

  	regs->regs[0] = usig;
  	regs->sp = (unsigned long)frame;
-	regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off +
-		offsetof(struct sigframe, fp);
+	regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off + fp_off;
  	regs->pc = (unsigned long)ka->sa.sa_handler;

  	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER)
@@ -294,7 +294,8 @@  static int setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set,
  	err |= setup_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
  	if (err == 0) {
  		setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
-			offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
+			offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig),
+			offsetof(struct sigframe, fp), usig);
  		if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO) {
  			err |= copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info);
  			regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
index a8ea73e..9030f14 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
@@ -147,7 +147,6 @@  static struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *ilp32_get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
  	struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *frame;

  	sp = sp_top = sigsp(regs->sp, ksig);
-
  	sp = (sp - sizeof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe)) & ~15;
  	frame = (struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *)sp;

@@ -183,7 +182,8 @@  int ilp32_setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig,
  	err |= setup_ilp32_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
  	if (err == 0) {
  		setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
-			     offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
+			     offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig),
+			     offsetof(struct ilp32_sigframe, fp), usig);
  		regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
  		regs->regs[2] = (unsigned long)&frame->sig.uc;
  	}