sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c: add missing implementation when !__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS

Message ID 20211226103653.661763-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com
State Superseded
Headers
Series sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c: add missing implementation when !__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS |

Checks

Context Check Description
dj/TryBot-apply_patch success Patch applied to master at the time it was sent

Commit Message

Thomas Petazzoni Dec. 26, 2021, 10:36 a.m. UTC
  In commit a92f4e6299fe0e3cb6f77e79de00817aece501ce ("linux: Add time64
pselect support"), a Microblaze specific implementation of
__pselect32() was added to cover the case of kernels < 3.15 which lack
the pselect6 system call.

This new file sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c takes
precedence over the default implementation
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c.

However sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c provides an implementation
of __pselect32() which is needed when __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS is not
defined. On Microblaze, which is a 32-bit architecture,
__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS is only true for kernels >= 5.1.

Due to sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c taking
precedence over sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c, it means that
when we are with a kernel >= 3.15 but < 5.1, we need a __pselect32()
implementation, but sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
doesn't provide it, and sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c which
would provide it is not compiled in.

This causes the following build failure on Microblaze with for example
Linux kernel headers 4.9:

/home/thomas/buildroot/buildroot/output/host/lib/gcc/microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu/10.3.0/../../../../microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /home/thomas/buildroot/buildroot/output/build/glibc-2.34-9-g9acab0bba6a5a57323b1f94bf95b21618a9e5aa4/build/libc_pic.os: in function `__pselect64':
(.text+0x120b44): undefined reference to `__pselect32'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

To fix this, we take a crude approach: replicate in
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c the
!__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS implementation that is already in
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
---
 .../unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c    | 22 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Adhemerval Zanella Dec. 28, 2021, 12:08 p.m. UTC | #1
On 26/12/2021 07:36, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> In commit a92f4e6299fe0e3cb6f77e79de00817aece501ce ("linux: Add time64
> pselect support"), a Microblaze specific implementation of
> __pselect32() was added to cover the case of kernels < 3.15 which lack
> the pselect6 system call.
> 
> This new file sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c takes
> precedence over the default implementation
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c.
> 
> However sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c provides an implementation
> of __pselect32() which is needed when __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS is not
> defined. On Microblaze, which is a 32-bit architecture,
> __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS is only true for kernels >= 5.1.
> 
> Due to sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c taking
> precedence over sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c, it means that
> when we are with a kernel >= 3.15 but < 5.1, we need a __pselect32()
> implementation, but sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
> doesn't provide it, and sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c which
> would provide it is not compiled in.
> 
> This causes the following build failure on Microblaze with for example
> Linux kernel headers 4.9:
> 
> /home/thomas/buildroot/buildroot/output/host/lib/gcc/microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu/10.3.0/../../../../microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /home/thomas/buildroot/buildroot/output/build/glibc-2.34-9-g9acab0bba6a5a57323b1f94bf95b21618a9e5aa4/build/libc_pic.os: in function `__pselect64':
> (.text+0x120b44): undefined reference to `__pselect32'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> To fix this, we take a crude approach: replicate in
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c the
> !__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS implementation that is already in
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c.

Thanks for reporting it and it is the right fix.  I am checking a simpler
fix to avoid duplicate the code:

diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
index 70b7b52a48..dd9d56ba29 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
@@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
 #include <sys/poll.h>
 #include <sysdep-cancel.h>
 
-#ifndef __ASSUME_PSELECT
+#ifndef __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALL
+#include <sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c>
+#elif !defined __ASSUME_PSELECT
 int
 __pselect32 (int nfds, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds,
             fd_set *exceptfds, const struct __timespec64 *timeout,


> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  .../unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c    | 22 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
> index 70b7b52a48..6b6b3e8a2e 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,25 @@
>  #include <sys/poll.h>
>  #include <sysdep-cancel.h>
>  
> -#ifndef __ASSUME_PSELECT
> +#if !defined(__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS)
> +int
> +__pselect32 (int nfds, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds,
> +	     fd_set *exceptfds, const struct __timespec64 *timeout,
> +	     const sigset_t *sigmask)
> +{
> +  struct timespec ts32, *pts32 = NULL;
> +  if (timeout != NULL)
> +    {
> +      ts32 = valid_timespec64_to_timespec (*timeout);
> +      pts32 = &ts32;
> +    }
> +
> +  return SYSCALL_CANCEL (pselect6, nfds, readfds, writefds, exceptfds,
> +			 pts32,
> +			 ((__syscall_ulong_t[]){ (uintptr_t) sigmask,
> +						 __NSIG_BYTES }));
> +}
> +#elif !defined(__ASSUME_PSELECT)
>  int
>  __pselect32 (int nfds, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds,
>  	     fd_set *exceptfds, const struct __timespec64 *timeout,
> @@ -57,4 +75,4 @@ __pselect32 (int nfds, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds,
>  
>    return ret;
>  }
> -#endif /* __ASSUME_PSELECT  */
> +#endif
  
Thomas Petazzoni Jan. 3, 2022, 3:45 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello Adhemerval,

On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 09:08:44 -0300
Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:

> > To fix this, we take a crude approach: replicate in
> > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c the
> > !__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS implementation that is already in
> > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c.  
> 
> Thanks for reporting it and it is the right fix.  I am checking a simpler
> fix to avoid duplicate the code:

Sounds good to me! I see you already committed it. Thanks a lot for the
very fast review!

Best regards,

Thomas
  

Patch

diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
index 70b7b52a48..6b6b3e8a2e 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
@@ -22,7 +22,25 @@ 
 #include <sys/poll.h>
 #include <sysdep-cancel.h>
 
-#ifndef __ASSUME_PSELECT
+#if !defined(__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS)
+int
+__pselect32 (int nfds, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds,
+	     fd_set *exceptfds, const struct __timespec64 *timeout,
+	     const sigset_t *sigmask)
+{
+  struct timespec ts32, *pts32 = NULL;
+  if (timeout != NULL)
+    {
+      ts32 = valid_timespec64_to_timespec (*timeout);
+      pts32 = &ts32;
+    }
+
+  return SYSCALL_CANCEL (pselect6, nfds, readfds, writefds, exceptfds,
+			 pts32,
+			 ((__syscall_ulong_t[]){ (uintptr_t) sigmask,
+						 __NSIG_BYTES }));
+}
+#elif !defined(__ASSUME_PSELECT)
 int
 __pselect32 (int nfds, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds,
 	     fd_set *exceptfds, const struct __timespec64 *timeout,
@@ -57,4 +75,4 @@  __pselect32 (int nfds, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds,
 
   return ret;
 }
-#endif /* __ASSUME_PSELECT  */
+#endif