[1/2] stdlib/tst-setcontext.c: Check for clobbering of signal stack.
Commit Message
On Mon 03 Mar 2014 14:58:00 Will Newton wrote:
> + sigaltstack(NULL, &stack_after);
incorrect style (and below). fixed with below as obvious.
-mike
From a1d8c6215d0bcda6985cb383d8c440b03db7253d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 08:55:20 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] tst-setcontext: fix style
---
stdlib/tst-setcontext.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Comments
On 3 August 2014 13:57, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon 03 Mar 2014 14:58:00 Will Newton wrote:
>> + sigaltstack(NULL, &stack_after);
>
> incorrect style (and below). fixed with below as obvious.
> -mike
Thanks for noticing and fixing this.
As penance I have gone through the patchwork and cleaned up a number
of patches in various states so we are now back under one page of
patches to review!
> From a1d8c6215d0bcda6985cb383d8c440b03db7253d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 08:55:20 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] tst-setcontext: fix style
>
> ---
> stdlib/tst-setcontext.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/stdlib/tst-setcontext.c b/stdlib/tst-setcontext.c
> index 55984a4..74d5133 100644
> --- a/stdlib/tst-setcontext.c
> +++ b/stdlib/tst-setcontext.c
> @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ f2 (void)
> }
>
> void
> -test_stack(volatile int a, volatile int b,
> - volatile int c, volatile int d)
> +test_stack (volatile int a, volatile int b,
> + volatile int c, volatile int d)
> {
> volatile int e = 5;
> volatile int f = 6;
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ test_stack(volatile int a, volatile int b,
>
> /* Test for cases where getcontext is clobbering the callers
> stack, including parameters. */
> - getcontext(&uc);
> + getcontext (&uc);
>
> if (a != 1)
> {
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ main (void)
> char st1[32768];
> stack_t stack_before, stack_after;
>
> - sigaltstack(NULL, &stack_before);
> + sigaltstack (NULL, &stack_before);
>
> puts ("making contexts");
> if (getcontext (&ctx[1]) != 0)
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ main (void)
> puts ("back at main program");
> back_in_main = 1;
>
> - sigaltstack(NULL, &stack_after);
> + sigaltstack (NULL, &stack_after);
>
> if (was_in_f1 == 0)
> {
> --
> 2.0.0
>
>
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ f2 (void)
}
void
-test_stack(volatile int a, volatile int b,
- volatile int c, volatile int d)
+test_stack (volatile int a, volatile int b,
+ volatile int c, volatile int d)
{
volatile int e = 5;
volatile int f = 6;
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ test_stack(volatile int a, volatile int b,
/* Test for cases where getcontext is clobbering the callers
stack, including parameters. */
- getcontext(&uc);
+ getcontext (&uc);
if (a != 1)
{
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ main (void)
char st1[32768];
stack_t stack_before, stack_after;
- sigaltstack(NULL, &stack_before);
+ sigaltstack (NULL, &stack_before);
puts ("making contexts");
if (getcontext (&ctx[1]) != 0)
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ main (void)
puts ("back at main program");
back_in_main = 1;
- sigaltstack(NULL, &stack_after);
+ sigaltstack (NULL, &stack_after);
if (was_in_f1 == 0)
{