Message ID | CABOHX+fu+oKh6evsp65ZdLtXUqb7U2s57zn9Ndm=oK2AYXejKQ@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 10/06/2015 05:52 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > Another belated ping, again I'll go ahead with it as its trivial/obvious. > > --- > Hi, > > This was first applied by Pierre-Marie back in February (see > 63e43d3aedb8b1112899c2d0ad74cbbee687e5d6), but my re-write of d-exp.y > was written about 6 months earlier, and I subsequently missed it when > backporting upstream changes. > > This reapplies that change. > In these cases, I really see no need to wait for pre-commit review. You should feel comfortable to go ahead immediately. Thanks, Pedro Alves
gdb/ChangeLog: * d-exp.y: Remove an obsolete comment and propagate the block information to the produced expression. --- diff --git a/gdb/d-exp.y b/gdb/d-exp.y index dd87d8a..b66565d 100644 --- a/gdb/d-exp.y +++ b/gdb/d-exp.y @@ -483,9 +483,7 @@ PrimaryExpression: } write_exp_elt_opcode (pstate, OP_VAR_VALUE); - /* We want to use the selected frame, not another more inner frame - which happens to be in the same block. */ - write_exp_elt_block (pstate, NULL); + write_exp_elt_block (pstate, sym.block); write_exp_elt_sym (pstate, sym.symbol); write_exp_elt_opcode (pstate, OP_VAR_VALUE); }