[v3,3/6] Share parts of gdb/inflow.c with gdbserver
Commit Message
After sharing parts of gdb/terminal.h, it is also needed to share the
two functions on gdb/inflow.c that are going to be needed by the
fork_inferior sharing. They are 'gdb_setpgid' and the new
'have_job_control'.
gdb/ChangeLog:
yyyy-mm-dd Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
* Makefile.in (SFILES): Add "common/common-inflow.c".
(COMMON_OBS): Add "common/common-inflow.o".
* common/common-inflow.c: New file, with contents from
"gdb/inflow.c".
* inflow.c (gdb_setpgid): Move to "common/common-inflow.c".
(_initialize_inflow): Move setting of "job_control" to
"handle_job_control".
* utils.c (job_control): Delete.
gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
yyyy-mm-dd Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
* Makefile.in: Add rule for "common-inflow.o".
(SFILE): Add "common/common-inflow.c".
(OBS): Add "common-inflow.o".
---
gdb/Makefile.in | 2 +
gdb/common/common-inflow.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/gdbserver/Makefile.in | 5 +++
gdb/inflow.c | 63 +-------------------------------
gdb/utils.c | 4 --
5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gdb/common/common-inflow.c
Comments
On 02/08/2017 03:22 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> yyyy-mm-dd Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>
> * Makefile.in (SFILES): Add "common/common-inflow.c".
> (COMMON_OBS): Add "common/common-inflow.o".
> * common/common-inflow.c: New file, with contents from
> "gdb/inflow.c".
> * inflow.c (gdb_setpgid): Move to "common/common-inflow.c".
> (_initialize_inflow): Move setting of "job_control" to
> "handle_job_control".
> * utils.c (job_control): Delete.
>
> gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
> yyyy-mm-dd Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>
> * Makefile.in: Add rule for "common-inflow.o".
> (SFILE): Add "common/common-inflow.c".
> (OBS): Add "common-inflow.o".
We should take the opportunity to rename the file to something that
makes a more sense wrt to its contents. "inflow.c" in gdb is
horribly named, I think simply due to code evolution. It used to
contain, many many years ago the (from the top of the file):
/* Low level interface to ptrace, for GDB when running under Unix.
but everything related to low level ptrace stuff moved away, and
all it was left with was the terminal/job control stuff.
Maybe call it common/job-control.c or maybe something even more
to the point or something like that.
> diff --git a/gdb/common/common-inflow.c b/gdb/common/common-inflow.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9871b5e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/common/common-inflow.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +/* Low level interface to ptrace, for GDB and gdbserver when running under Unix.
Please update this. The file really has nothing to do with ptrace.
> +
> +#include "common-defs.h"
> +#include "common-terminal.h"
> +
> +/* Nonzero if we have job control. */
> +int job_control;
> +
> +/* This is here because this is where we figure out whether we (probably)
> + have job control. Just using job_control only does part of it because
> + setpgid or setpgrp might not exist on a system without job control.
> + It might be considered misplaced (on the other hand, process groups and
> + job control are closely related to ttys).
This "misplaced" comment could use some updating. This is no longer
next to the tty stuff.
> +
> + For a more clean implementation, in libiberty, put a setpgid which merely
> + calls setpgrp and a setpgrp which does nothing (any system with job control
> + will have one or the other). */
> +
> +int
> +gdb_setpgid (void)
> +{
> + int retval = 0;
> +
> + if (job_control)
> + {
> +#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP)
> +#ifdef HAVE_SETPGID
> + /* The call setpgid (0, 0) is supposed to work and mean the same
> + thing as this, but on Ultrix 4.2A it fails with EPERM (and
> + setpgid (getpid (), getpid ()) succeeds). */
> + retval = setpgid (getpid (), getpid ());
> +#else
> +#ifdef HAVE_SETPGRP
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
Thanks for the review. Comments below.
On Wednesday, February 15 2017, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/08/2017 03:22 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>> yyyy-mm-dd Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>>
>> * Makefile.in (SFILES): Add "common/common-inflow.c".
>> (COMMON_OBS): Add "common/common-inflow.o".
>> * common/common-inflow.c: New file, with contents from
>> "gdb/inflow.c".
>> * inflow.c (gdb_setpgid): Move to "common/common-inflow.c".
>> (_initialize_inflow): Move setting of "job_control" to
>> "handle_job_control".
>> * utils.c (job_control): Delete.
>>
>> gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
>> yyyy-mm-dd Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>>
>> * Makefile.in: Add rule for "common-inflow.o".
>> (SFILE): Add "common/common-inflow.c".
>> (OBS): Add "common-inflow.o".
>
>
> We should take the opportunity to rename the file to something that
> makes a more sense wrt to its contents. "inflow.c" in gdb is
> horribly named, I think simply due to code evolution. It used to
> contain, many many years ago the (from the top of the file):
>
> /* Low level interface to ptrace, for GDB when running under Unix.
>
> but everything related to low level ptrace stuff moved away, and
> all it was left with was the terminal/job control stuff.
>
> Maybe call it common/job-control.c or maybe something even more
> to the point or something like that.
Good point, I hadn't thought about that. I renamed the file to
common/job-control.c, because even though it also contains terminal
related stuff, the main purpose of the functions there is to help with
job control.
>> diff --git a/gdb/common/common-inflow.c b/gdb/common/common-inflow.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..9871b5e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gdb/common/common-inflow.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
>> +/* Low level interface to ptrace, for GDB and gdbserver when running under Unix.
>
> Please update this. The file really has nothing to do with ptrace.
Done.
>> +
>> +#include "common-defs.h"
>> +#include "common-terminal.h"
>> +
>> +/* Nonzero if we have job control. */
>> +int job_control;
>> +
>> +/* This is here because this is where we figure out whether we (probably)
>> + have job control. Just using job_control only does part of it because
>> + setpgid or setpgrp might not exist on a system without job control.
>> + It might be considered misplaced (on the other hand, process groups and
>> + job control are closely related to ttys).
>
>
> This "misplaced" comment could use some updating. This is no longer
> next to the tty stuff.
Done.
>> +
>> + For a more clean implementation, in libiberty, put a setpgid which merely
>> + calls setpgrp and a setpgrp which does nothing (any system with job control
>> + will have one or the other). */
>> +
>> +int
>> +gdb_setpgid (void)
>> +{
>> + int retval = 0;
>> +
>> + if (job_control)
>> + {
>> +#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP)
>> +#ifdef HAVE_SETPGID
>> + /* The call setpgid (0, 0) is supposed to work and mean the same
>> + thing as this, but on Ultrix 4.2A it fails with EPERM (and
>> + setpgid (getpid (), getpid ()) succeeds). */
>> + retval = setpgid (getpid (), getpid ());
>> +#else
>> +#ifdef HAVE_SETPGRP
Thanks,
@@ -1198,6 +1198,7 @@ SFILES = \
common/fileio.c \
common/filestuff.c \
common/format.c \
+ common/common-inflow.c \
common/gdb_vecs.c \
common/new-op.c \
common/print-utils.c \
@@ -1626,6 +1627,7 @@ COMMON_OBS = $(DEPFILES) $(CONFIG_OBS) $(YYOBJ) \
common-agent.o \
common-debug.o \
common-exceptions.o \
+ common-inflow.o \
common-regcache.o \
common-utils.o \
complaints.o \
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/* Low level interface to ptrace, for GDB and gdbserver when running under Unix.
+ Copyright (C) 1986-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ This file is part of GDB.
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+#include "common-defs.h"
+#include "common-terminal.h"
+
+/* Nonzero if we have job control. */
+int job_control;
+
+/* This is here because this is where we figure out whether we (probably)
+ have job control. Just using job_control only does part of it because
+ setpgid or setpgrp might not exist on a system without job control.
+ It might be considered misplaced (on the other hand, process groups and
+ job control are closely related to ttys).
+
+ For a more clean implementation, in libiberty, put a setpgid which merely
+ calls setpgrp and a setpgrp which does nothing (any system with job control
+ will have one or the other). */
+
+int
+gdb_setpgid (void)
+{
+ int retval = 0;
+
+ if (job_control)
+ {
+#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP)
+#ifdef HAVE_SETPGID
+ /* The call setpgid (0, 0) is supposed to work and mean the same
+ thing as this, but on Ultrix 4.2A it fails with EPERM (and
+ setpgid (getpid (), getpid ()) succeeds). */
+ retval = setpgid (getpid (), getpid ());
+#else
+#ifdef HAVE_SETPGRP
+#ifdef SETPGRP_VOID
+ retval = setpgrp ();
+#else
+ retval = setpgrp (getpid (), getpid ());
+#endif
+#endif /* HAVE_SETPGRP */
+#endif /* HAVE_SETPGID */
+#endif /* defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP) */
+ }
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
+/* See common/common-terminal.h. */
+
+void
+have_job_control (void)
+{
+ /* OK, figure out whether we have job control. If neither termios nor
+ sgtty (i.e. termio or go32), leave job_control 0. */
+#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS)
+ /* Do all systems with termios have the POSIX way of identifying job
+ control? I hope so. */
+#ifdef _POSIX_JOB_CONTROL
+ job_control = 1;
+#else
+#ifdef _SC_JOB_CONTROL
+ job_control = sysconf (_SC_JOB_CONTROL);
+#else
+ job_control = 0; /* Have to assume the worst. */
+#endif /* _SC_JOB_CONTROL */
+#endif /* _POSIX_JOB_CONTROL */
+#endif /* HAVE_TERMIOS */
+
+#ifdef HAVE_SGTTY
+#ifdef TIOCGPGRP
+ job_control = 1;
+#else
+ job_control = 0;
+#endif /* TIOCGPGRP */
+#endif /* sgtty */
+}
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ SFILES = \
$(srcdir)/common/environ.c \
$(srcdir)/common/fileio.c \
$(srcdir)/common/filestuff.c \
+ $(srcdir)/common/common-inflow.c \
$(srcdir)/common/gdb_vecs.c \
$(srcdir)/common/new-op.c \
$(srcdir)/common/print-utils.c \
@@ -234,6 +235,7 @@ OBS = \
cleanups.o \
common-debug.o \
common-exceptions.o \
+ common-inflow.o \
common-regcache.o \
common-utils.o \
debug.o \
@@ -770,6 +772,9 @@ format.o: ../common/format.c
filestuff.o: ../common/filestuff.c
$(COMPILE) $<
$(POSTCOMPILE)
+common-inflow.o: ../common/common-inflow.c
+ $(COMPILE) $<
+ $(POSTCOMPILE)
agent.o: ../common/agent.c
$(COMPILE) $<
$(POSTCOMPILE)
@@ -803,43 +803,6 @@ create_tty_session (void)
#endif /* HAVE_SETSID */
}
-/* This is here because this is where we figure out whether we (probably)
- have job control. Just using job_control only does part of it because
- setpgid or setpgrp might not exist on a system without job control.
- It might be considered misplaced (on the other hand, process groups and
- job control are closely related to ttys).
-
- For a more clean implementation, in libiberty, put a setpgid which merely
- calls setpgrp and a setpgrp which does nothing (any system with job control
- will have one or the other). */
-int
-gdb_setpgid (void)
-{
- int retval = 0;
-
- if (job_control)
- {
-#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP)
-#ifdef HAVE_SETPGID
- /* The call setpgid (0, 0) is supposed to work and mean the same
- thing as this, but on Ultrix 4.2A it fails with EPERM (and
- setpgid (getpid (), getpid ()) succeeds). */
- retval = setpgid (getpid (), getpid ());
-#else
-#ifdef HAVE_SETPGRP
-#ifdef SETPGRP_VOID
- retval = setpgrp ();
-#else
- retval = setpgrp (getpid (), getpid ());
-#endif
-#endif /* HAVE_SETPGRP */
-#endif /* HAVE_SETPGID */
-#endif /* defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP) */
- }
-
- return retval;
-}
-
/* Get all the current tty settings (including whether we have a
tty at all!). We can't do this in _initialize_inflow because
serial_fdopen() won't work until the serial_ops_list is
@@ -860,30 +823,8 @@ _initialize_inflow (void)
terminal_is_ours = 1;
- /* OK, figure out whether we have job control. If neither termios nor
- sgtty (i.e. termio or go32), leave job_control 0. */
-
-#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS)
- /* Do all systems with termios have the POSIX way of identifying job
- control? I hope so. */
-#ifdef _POSIX_JOB_CONTROL
- job_control = 1;
-#else
-#ifdef _SC_JOB_CONTROL
- job_control = sysconf (_SC_JOB_CONTROL);
-#else
- job_control = 0; /* Have to assume the worst. */
-#endif /* _SC_JOB_CONTROL */
-#endif /* _POSIX_JOB_CONTROL */
-#endif /* HAVE_TERMIOS */
-
-#ifdef HAVE_SGTTY
-#ifdef TIOCGPGRP
- job_control = 1;
-#else
- job_control = 0;
-#endif /* TIOCGPGRP */
-#endif /* sgtty */
+ /* OK, figure out whether we have job control. */
+ have_job_control ();
observer_attach_inferior_exit (inflow_inferior_exit);
@@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ static std::chrono::steady_clock::duration prompt_for_continue_wait_time;
static int debug_timestamp = 0;
-/* Nonzero if we have job control. */
-
-int job_control;
-
/* Nonzero means that strings with character values >0x7F should be printed
as octal escapes. Zero means just print the value (e.g. it's an
international character, and the terminal or window can cope.) */