diff mbox

Remove comments on software_single_step in gdbarch.sh

Message ID 1458551911-24637-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org
State New, archived
Headers

Commit Message

Yao Qi March 21, 2016, 9:18 a.m. UTC 
  This comment is out of date.  We've already done that.  Patch is to remove
it.

gdb:

2016-03-21  Yao Qi  <yao.qi@linaro.org>

	* gdbarch.sh (software_single_step): Remove comments.
	* gdbarch.h: Regenerated.
---
 gdb/gdbarch.h  | 4 ----
 gdb/gdbarch.sh | 4 ----
 2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Yao Qi March 23, 2016, 11:22 a.m. UTC | #1 
Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com> writes:

> This comment is out of date.  We've already done that.  Patch is to remove
> it.
>
> gdb:
>
> 2016-03-21  Yao Qi  <yao.qi@linaro.org>
>
> 	* gdbarch.sh (software_single_step): Remove comments.
> 	* gdbarch.h: Regenerated.

Patch is pushed in.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.h b/gdb/gdbarch.h
index 55c1586..ba3d4ca 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbarch.h
+++ b/gdb/gdbarch.h
@@ -646,10 +646,6 @@  extern void set_gdbarch_addr_bits_remove (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_addr_
    indicates if the target needs software single step.  An ISA method to
    implement it.
   
-   FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: This should be replaced with something that inserts
-   breakpoints using the breakpoint system instead of blatting memory directly
-   (as with rs6000).
-  
    FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: The logic is backwards.  It should be asking if the
    target can single step.  If not, then implement single step using breakpoints.
   
diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.sh b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
index a1c92be..8192370 100755
--- a/gdb/gdbarch.sh
+++ b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
@@ -605,10 +605,6 @@  m:CORE_ADDR:addr_bits_remove:CORE_ADDR addr:addr::core_addr_identity::0
 # indicates if the target needs software single step.  An ISA method to
 # implement it.
 #
-# FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: This should be replaced with something that inserts
-# breakpoints using the breakpoint system instead of blatting memory directly
-# (as with rs6000).
-#
 # FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: The logic is backwards.  It should be asking if the
 # target can single step.  If not, then implement single step using breakpoints.
 #