[FYI] fix incorrect comments in minsyms.h
Commit Message
minsyms.h incorrectly claims that a couple of functions call
prim_record_minimal_symbol_full with COPY_NAME=0 -- but actually they
pass 1. Passing 1 is the correct behavior, so this patch fixes the
documentation.
I'm checking this in as obvious.
2014-06-16 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* minsyms.h (prim_record_minimal_symbol)
(prim_record_minimal_symbol_and_info): Update comments.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
gdb/minsyms.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct minimal_symbol *prim_record_minimal_symbol_full
/* Like prim_record_minimal_symbol_full, but:
- uses strlen to compute NAME_LEN,
- - passes COPY_NAME = 0,
+ - passes COPY_NAME = 1,
- and passes a default SECTION, depending on the type
This variant does not return the new symbol. */
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ void prim_record_minimal_symbol (const char *, CORE_ADDR,
/* Like prim_record_minimal_symbol_full, but:
- uses strlen to compute NAME_LEN,
- - passes COPY_NAME = 0. */
+ - passes COPY_NAME = 1. */
struct minimal_symbol *prim_record_minimal_symbol_and_info
(const char *,