Fix gdb.dwarf2/varval.exp with -fPIE/-pie
Commit Message
Hi,
With target board unix/-fPIE/-pie, we get:
...
FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/varval.exp: print varval2
...
This is due comparing a get_frame_pc result (which includes the for PIE
non-zero relocation offset) with pc_high and pc_low obtained using
get_scope_pc_bounds (which do not include the relocation offset).
Fix this by adjusting pc_high and pc_low with the relocation offset.
Tested on x86_64-linux with target board unix/-fPIE/-pie.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
[gdb] Fix gdb.dwarf2/varval.exp with -fPIE/-pie
gdb/ChangeLog:
2019-08-08 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR gdb/24591
* dwarf2read.c (dwarf2_fetch_die_loc_sect_off): Adjust pc_high and
pc_low with relocation offset.
---
gdb/dwarf2read.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Comments
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:
Thanks for the patch.
Tom> + CORE_ADDR baseaddr
Tom> + = ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, SECT_OFF_TEXT (objfile));
Tom> + struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_objfile_arch (objfile);
Tom> for (const auto &cand_off
Tom> : dwarf2_per_objfile->abstract_to_concrete[die->sect_off])
Tom> @@ -23220,6 +23223,8 @@ dwarf2_fetch_die_loc_sect_off (sect_offset sect_off,
Tom> CORE_ADDR pc_low, pc_high;
Tom> get_scope_pc_bounds (cand->parent, &pc_low, &pc_high, cu);
Tom> + pc_low = gdbarch_adjust_dwarf2_addr (gdbarch, pc_low + baseaddr);
Tom> + pc_high = gdbarch_adjust_dwarf2_addr (gdbarch, pc_high + baseaddr);
Tom> if (pc_low == ((CORE_ADDR) -1)
I think this test has to precede the offsetting.
Tom
On Thu, 08 Aug 2019 11:16:44 -0600
Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> Tom> + CORE_ADDR baseaddr
> Tom> + = ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, SECT_OFF_TEXT (objfile));
> Tom> + struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_objfile_arch (objfile);
>
> Tom> for (const auto &cand_off
> Tom> : dwarf2_per_objfile->abstract_to_concrete[die->sect_off])
> Tom> @@ -23220,6 +23223,8 @@ dwarf2_fetch_die_loc_sect_off (sect_offset sect_off,
>
> Tom> CORE_ADDR pc_low, pc_high;
> Tom> get_scope_pc_bounds (cand->parent, &pc_low, &pc_high, cu);
> Tom> + pc_low = gdbarch_adjust_dwarf2_addr (gdbarch, pc_low + baseaddr);
> Tom> + pc_high = gdbarch_adjust_dwarf2_addr (gdbarch, pc_high + baseaddr);
> Tom> if (pc_low == ((CORE_ADDR) -1)
>
> I think this test has to precede the offsetting.
Yes, I agree.
It appears to me that the test / continue in its entirety...
if (pc_low == ((CORE_ADDR) -1)
|| !(pc_low <= pc && pc < pc_high))
continue;
...will need to be split with the -1 part being performed before the
pc_low/pc_high adjustment and the other part being performed after.
Kevin
@@ -23206,6 +23206,9 @@ dwarf2_fetch_die_loc_sect_off (sect_offset sect_off,
!= dwarf2_per_objfile->abstract_to_concrete.end ()))
{
CORE_ADDR pc = (*get_frame_pc) (baton);
+ CORE_ADDR baseaddr
+ = ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, SECT_OFF_TEXT (objfile));
+ struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_objfile_arch (objfile);
for (const auto &cand_off
: dwarf2_per_objfile->abstract_to_concrete[die->sect_off])
@@ -23220,6 +23223,8 @@ dwarf2_fetch_die_loc_sect_off (sect_offset sect_off,
CORE_ADDR pc_low, pc_high;
get_scope_pc_bounds (cand->parent, &pc_low, &pc_high, cu);
+ pc_low = gdbarch_adjust_dwarf2_addr (gdbarch, pc_low + baseaddr);
+ pc_high = gdbarch_adjust_dwarf2_addr (gdbarch, pc_high + baseaddr);
if (pc_low == ((CORE_ADDR) -1)
|| !(pc_low <= pc && pc < pc_high))
continue;