[gdb/testsuite] Fix command result testing in mi-complete.exp

  Hi,

When running gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp in conjunction with:
...
$ stress -c $(($(cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -c "^processor") + 1))
...
we get less than 50% full passes:
...
$ for n in  $(seq 1 100); do \
    make V=1 -O check \
      'RUNTESTFLAGS=gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp --target_board=unix'; \
  done 2>&1 \
  | grep "expected passes" | sort | uniq -c
     45 # of expected passes            7
      9 # of expected passes            8
     46 # of expected passes            9
...

A diff between a passing and failing gdb.log shows this difference:
...
-&"set max-completions 1\n"
 2-complete br
+&"set max-completions 1\n"
...

The problem is that the test-case issues the "set max-completion <n>" command,
and without waiting for the output issues a next command, and tries to parse
the results of both commands, expecting a specific interleaving of the various
output streams.

Fix the FAIL by waiting for the result of the "set max-completion <n>" command
before issuing another command.

Tested on x86_64-linux.

OK for trunk?

Thanks,
- Tom

[gdb/testsuite] Fix command result testing in mi-complete.exp

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2019-07-23  Tom de Vries  <tdevries@suse.de>

	PR testsuite/24711
	* gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp: Wait for "set max-completions" result before
	issuing next command.

---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

* Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> [2019-07-23 09:50:12 +0200]:

> Hi,
> 
> When running gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp in conjunction with:
> ...
> $ stress -c $(($(cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -c "^processor") + 1))
> ...
> we get less than 50% full passes:
> ...
> $ for n in  $(seq 1 100); do \
>     make V=1 -O check \
>       'RUNTESTFLAGS=gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp --target_board=unix'; \
>   done 2>&1 \
>   | grep "expected passes" | sort | uniq -c
>      45 # of expected passes            7
>       9 # of expected passes            8
>      46 # of expected passes            9
> ...
> 
> A diff between a passing and failing gdb.log shows this difference:
> ...
> -&"set max-completions 1\n"
>  2-complete br
> +&"set max-completions 1\n"
> ...
> 
> The problem is that the test-case issues the "set max-completion <n>" command,
> and without waiting for the output issues a next command, and tries to parse
> the results of both commands, expecting a specific interleaving of the various
> output streams.
> 
> Fix the FAIL by waiting for the result of the "set max-completion <n>" command
> before issuing another command.
> 
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
> 
> OK for trunk?

Looks good to me.

Thanks,
Andrew


> 
> Thanks,
> - Tom
> 
> [gdb/testsuite] Fix command result testing in mi-complete.exp
> 
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2019-07-23  Tom de Vries  <tdevries@suse.de>
> 
> 	PR testsuite/24711
> 	* gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp: Wait for "set max-completions" result before
> 	issuing next command.
> 
> ---
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp
> index 692b004fd9..5b9613548f 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-complete.exp
> @@ -58,14 +58,16 @@ mi_gdb_test "-info-gdb-mi-command complete" \
>  
>  # Limit max completions and check that max_completions_reached=\"0\" is set
>  # to 1.
> -send_gdb "set max-completions 1\n"
> +mi_gdb_test "set max-completions 1" ".*=cmd-param-changed.*\\^done" \
> +    "set max-completions 1"
>  
>  mi_gdb_test "2-complete br" \
>              ".*2\\^done,completion=\"br\[A-Za-z0-9-\]+\",matches=\\\[\"br\[A-Za-z0-9-\]+\"\\\],max_completions_reached=\"1\"" \
>              "-complete br, max-completions 1"
>  
>  # Disable completions and check an error is returned
> -send_gdb "set max-completions 0\n"
> +mi_gdb_test "set max-completions 0" ".*=cmd-param-changed.*\\^done" \
> +    "set max-completions 0"
>  
>  mi_gdb_test "3-complete br" \
>              ".*3\\^error,msg=\".*" \