Fix gcc 9 build errors for make xcheck.
Commit Message
On 6/17/19 4:59 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Jun 17 2019, Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/17/19 4:07 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> On Jun 17 2019, Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/benchtests/bench-strstr.c b/benchtests/bench-strstr.c
>>>> index 2cbe13e9ac..14053e7a22 100644
>>>> --- a/benchtests/bench-strstr.c
>>>> +++ b/benchtests/bench-strstr.c
>>>> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ do_one_test (impl_t *impl, const char *s1, const char *s2, char *exp_result)
>>>> if (res != exp_result)
>>>> {
>>>> error (0, 0, "Wrong result in function %s %s %s", impl->name,
>>>> - res, exp_result);
>>>> + res, (exp_result == NULL) ? "NULL" : exp_result);
>>>
>>> res can be NULL too.
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/string/test-strcasestr.c b/string/test-strcasestr.c
>>>> index 0a16f85dcd..1773581a3e 100644
>>>> --- a/string/test-strcasestr.c
>>>> +++ b/string/test-strcasestr.c
>>>> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ check_result (impl_t *impl, const char *s1, const char *s2,
>>>> if (result != exp_result)
>>>> {
>>>> error (0, 0, "Wrong result in function %s %s %s", impl->name,
>>>> - result, exp_result);
>>>> + result, (exp_result == NULL) ? "NULL" : exp_result);
>>>
>>> result can be NULL too.
>>>
>>> Andreas.
>>>
>>
>> That's true.
>> The compiler does not emit a warning for those.
>> Shall we nevertheless add a check?
>
> Either check both or none. If NULL is a problem then it needs to be
> checked everywhere.
>
> Andreas.
>
Okay I've added the two mentioned occurrences and also added checks in
string/test-strstr.c.
Bye
Stefan
commit 22e4ba39c88bcb2c75e8f038551cd75362c17298
Author: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jun 14 12:54:38 2019 +0200
Fix gcc 9 build errors for make xcheck. [BZ #24556]
This patch fixes the following gcc 9 warnings for "make xcheck" / "make bench":
-string/tst-strcasestr.c:
../include/bits/../../misc/bits/error.h:42:5: error: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
-argp/argp-test.c:
argp-test.c:130:20: error: ‘%d’ directive writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 10 [-Werror=format-overflow=]
argp-test.c:130:19: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 122]
argp-test.c:130:5: note: ‘sprintf’ output between 2 and 12 bytes into a destination of size 10
-nss/tst-field.c:
tst-field.c:52:7: error: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting
-benchtests/bench-strstr.c:
../include/bits/../../misc/bits/error.h:42:5: error: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
-benchtests/bench-malloc-simple.c:
bench-malloc-simple.c:93:16: error: iteration 3 invokes undefined behavior [-Werror=aggressive-loop-optimizations]
ChangeLog:
[BZ #24556]
* string/test-strcasestr.c (check_result): Add NULL check.
* nss/tst-field.c (check_rewrite): Likewise.
* benchtests/bench-strstr.c (do_one_test): Likewise.
* string/test-strstr.c (check_result): Likewise.
* argp/argp-test.c (popt): Increase size of buf to 12.
* benchtests/bench-malloc-simple.c (bench):
Do not initialize tests array out of bounds.
meld
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static const char doc[] = "Test program for argp."
static void
popt (int key, char *arg)
{
- char buf[10];
+ char buf[12];
if (isprint (key))
sprintf (buf, "%c", key);
else
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ bench (unsigned long size)
size_t iters = NUM_ITERS;
int **arr = (int**) malloc (MAX_ALLOCS * sizeof (void*));
- for (int t = 0; t <= 3; t++)
+ for (int t = 0; t < 3; t++)
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_ALLOCS; i++)
{
tests[t][i].n = allocs[i];
@@ -147,7 +147,8 @@ do_one_test (impl_t *impl, const char *s1, const char *s2, char *exp_result)
if (res != exp_result)
{
error (0, 0, "Wrong result in function %s %s %s", impl->name,
- res, exp_result);
+ (res == NULL) ? "NULL" : res,
+ (exp_result == NULL) ? "NULL" : exp_result);
ret = 1;
}
}
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ check_rewrite (const char *input, const char *expected)
if (result != NULL && strcmp (result, expected) != 0)
{
printf ("FAIL: rewrite \"%s\" -> \"%s\", expected \"%s\"\n",
- input, result, expected);
+ (input == NULL) ? "NULL" : input, result, expected);
errors = true;
}
free (to_free);
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ check_result (impl_t *impl, const char *s1, const char *s2,
if (result != exp_result)
{
error (0, 0, "Wrong result in function %s %s %s", impl->name,
- result, exp_result);
+ (result == NULL) ? "NULL" : result,
+ (exp_result == NULL) ? "NULL" : exp_result);
ret = 1;
return -1;
}
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ check_result (impl_t *impl, const char *s1, const char *s2,
if (result != exp_result)
{
error (0, 0, "Wrong result in function %s %s %s", impl->name,
- result, exp_result);
+ (result == NULL) ? "NULL" : result,
+ (exp_result == NULL) ? "NULL" : exp_result);
ret = 1;
return -1;
}