[v3] Use std::vector in lm_info_target
Commit Message
v3 simply updates the patch to the changes made to lm_info_target (previously
lm_info).
Replace the two VEC fields with std::vector.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* solib-target.c (struct lm_info): Add default constructor,
delete copy constructor and operator=.
<segment_bases, section_bases>: Change type to
std::vector<CORE_ADDR>.
(library_list_start_segment, library_list_start_section,
library_list_start_library, library_list_end_library,
solib_target_free_library_list, solib_target_free_so,
solib_target_relocate_section_addresses): Adjust.
---
gdb/solib-target.c | 41 +++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Comments
On 2017-04-29 20:34, Simon Marchi wrote:
> v3 simply updates the patch to the changes made to lm_info_target
> (previously
> lm_info).
>
> Replace the two VEC fields with std::vector.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> * solib-target.c (struct lm_info): Add default constructor,
> delete copy constructor and operator=.
> <segment_bases, section_bases>: Change type to
> std::vector<CORE_ADDR>.
> (library_list_start_segment, library_list_start_section,
> library_list_start_library, library_list_end_library,
> solib_target_free_library_list, solib_target_free_so,
> solib_target_relocate_section_addresses): Adjust.
Err I forgot to update the ChangeLog, here it is:
gdb/ChangeLog:
* solib-target.c: Include <vector>
(struct lm_info_target) <~lm_info_target>: Remove.
<segment_bases, section_bases>: Change type to
std::vector<CORE_ADDR>.
(library_list_start_segment, library_list_start_section,
library_list_end_library,
solib_target_relocate_section_addresses): Adjust.
Is the ChangeLog format acceptable for the destructor?
Simon
On 04/30/2017 01:42 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> Err I forgot to update the ChangeLog, here it is:
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> * solib-target.c: Include <vector>
> (struct lm_info_target) <~lm_info_target>: Remove.
> <segment_bases, section_bases>: Change type to
> std::vector<CORE_ADDR>.
> (library_list_start_segment, library_list_start_section,
> library_list_end_library,
> solib_target_relocate_section_addresses): Adjust.
>
> Is the ChangeLog format acceptable for the destructor?
Fine with me.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
On 04/30/2017 01:34 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> @@ -372,10 +364,7 @@ Could not relocate shared library \"%s\": wrong number of ALLOC sections"),
> {
> int bases_index = 0;
> int found_range = 0;
> - CORE_ADDR *section_bases;
> -
> - section_bases = VEC_address (CORE_ADDR,
> - li->section_bases);
> + CORE_ADDR *section_bases = li->section_bases.data ();
I think this variable could be eliminated, and replaced by further
below doing:
- low = section_bases[i];
+ low = li->section_bases[i];
in a couple places.
Otherwise LGTM.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
On 2017-05-02 12:12, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 04/30/2017 01:34 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>
>> @@ -372,10 +364,7 @@ Could not relocate shared library \"%s\": wrong
>> number of ALLOC sections"),
>> {
>> int bases_index = 0;
>> int found_range = 0;
>> - CORE_ADDR *section_bases;
>> -
>> - section_bases = VEC_address (CORE_ADDR,
>> - li->section_bases);
>> + CORE_ADDR *section_bases = li->section_bases.data ();
>
> I think this variable could be eliminated, and replaced by further
> below doing:
>
> - low = section_bases[i];
> + low = li->section_bases[i];
>
> in a couple places.
>
> Otherwise LGTM.
Indeed, I changed it. Thanks.
On 05/02/2017 06:25 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2017-05-02 12:12, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 04/30/2017 01:34 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -372,10 +364,7 @@ Could not relocate shared library \"%s\": wrong
>>> number of ALLOC sections"),
>>> {
>>> int bases_index = 0;
>>> int found_range = 0;
>>> - CORE_ADDR *section_bases;
>>> -
>>> - section_bases = VEC_address (CORE_ADDR,
>>> - li->section_bases);
>>> + CORE_ADDR *section_bases = li->section_bases.data ();
>>
>> I think this variable could be eliminated, and replaced by further
>> below doing:
>>
>> - low = section_bases[i];
>> + low = li->section_bases[i];
>>
>> in a couple places.
>>
>> Otherwise LGTM.
>
> Indeed, I changed it. Thanks.
>
Thanks. (There's a similar case in the segment_bases path, but
you probably saw it.)
On 2017-05-02 13:37, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 05/02/2017 06:25 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> Indeed, I changed it. Thanks.
>>
>
> Thanks. (There's a similar case in the segment_bases path, but
> you probably saw it.)
Oops, no. I'll look at it and push it as an obvious patch.
@@ -25,16 +25,11 @@
#include "target.h"
#include "vec.h"
#include "solib-target.h"
+#include <vector>
/* Private data for each loaded library. */
struct lm_info_target : public lm_info_base
{
- ~lm_info_target ()
- {
- VEC_free (CORE_ADDR, this->segment_bases);
- VEC_free (CORE_ADDR, this->section_bases);
- }
-
/* The library's name. The name is normally kept in the struct
so_list; it is only here during XML parsing. */
std::string name;
@@ -44,11 +39,11 @@ struct lm_info_target : public lm_info_base
/* The base addresses for each independently relocatable segment of
this shared library. */
- VEC(CORE_ADDR) *segment_bases = NULL;
+ std::vector<CORE_ADDR> segment_bases;
/* The base addresses for each independently allocatable,
relocatable section of this shared library. */
- VEC(CORE_ADDR) *section_bases = NULL;
+ std::vector<CORE_ADDR> section_bases;
/* The cached offsets for each section of this shared library,
determined from SEGMENT_BASES, or SECTION_BASES. */
@@ -92,11 +87,11 @@ library_list_start_segment (struct gdb_xml_parser *parser,
= (ULONGEST *) xml_find_attribute (attributes, "address")->value;
CORE_ADDR address = (CORE_ADDR) *address_p;
- if (last->section_bases != NULL)
+ if (!last->section_bases.empty ())
gdb_xml_error (parser,
_("Library list with both segments and sections"));
- VEC_safe_push (CORE_ADDR, last->segment_bases, address);
+ last->segment_bases.push_back (address);
}
static void
@@ -110,11 +105,11 @@ library_list_start_section (struct gdb_xml_parser *parser,
= (ULONGEST *) xml_find_attribute (attributes, "address")->value;
CORE_ADDR address = (CORE_ADDR) *address_p;
- if (last->segment_bases != NULL)
+ if (!last->segment_bases.empty ())
gdb_xml_error (parser,
_("Library list with both segments and sections"));
- VEC_safe_push (CORE_ADDR, last->section_bases, address);
+ last->section_bases.push_back (address);
}
/* Handle the start of a <library> element. */
@@ -141,10 +136,8 @@ library_list_end_library (struct gdb_xml_parser *parser,
VEC(lm_info_target_p) **list = (VEC(lm_info_target_p) **) user_data;
lm_info_target *lm_info = VEC_last (lm_info_target_p, *list);
- if (lm_info->segment_bases == NULL
- && lm_info->section_bases == NULL)
- gdb_xml_error (parser,
- _("No segment or section bases defined"));
+ if (lm_info->segment_bases.empty () && lm_info->section_bases.empty ())
+ gdb_xml_error (parser, _("No segment or section bases defined"));
}
@@ -350,12 +343,11 @@ solib_target_relocate_section_addresses (struct so_list *so,
= ((struct section_offsets *)
xzalloc (SIZEOF_N_SECTION_OFFSETS (num_sections)));
- if (li->section_bases)
+ if (!li->section_bases.empty ())
{
int i;
asection *sect;
- int num_section_bases
- = VEC_length (CORE_ADDR, li->section_bases);
+ int num_section_bases = li->section_bases.size ();
int num_alloc_sections = 0;
for (i = 0, sect = so->abfd->sections;
@@ -372,10 +364,7 @@ Could not relocate shared library \"%s\": wrong number of ALLOC sections"),
{
int bases_index = 0;
int found_range = 0;
- CORE_ADDR *section_bases;
-
- section_bases = VEC_address (CORE_ADDR,
- li->section_bases);
+ CORE_ADDR *section_bases = li->section_bases.data ();
so->addr_low = ~(CORE_ADDR) 0;
so->addr_high = 0;
@@ -408,7 +397,7 @@ Could not relocate shared library \"%s\": wrong number of ALLOC sections"),
gdb_assert (so->addr_low <= so->addr_high);
}
}
- else if (li->segment_bases)
+ else if (!li->segment_bases.empty ())
{
struct symfile_segment_data *data;
@@ -423,8 +412,8 @@ Could not relocate shared library \"%s\": no segments"), so->so_name);
int num_bases;
CORE_ADDR *segment_bases;
- num_bases = VEC_length (CORE_ADDR, li->segment_bases);
- segment_bases = VEC_address (CORE_ADDR, li->segment_bases);
+ num_bases = li->segment_bases.size ();
+ segment_bases = li->segment_bases.data ();
if (!symfile_map_offsets_to_segments (so->abfd, data, li->offsets,
num_bases, segment_bases))