Commit Message
Joseph Myers wrote:
> Would you like to propose a patch (that deprecates __ptr_t like that
Sure, that's easy enough. Proposed patch attached.
Comments
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Joseph Myers wrote:
> > Would you like to propose a patch (that deprecates __ptr_t like that
>
> Sure, that's easy enough. Proposed patch attached.
OK (subject to testing on at least one platform), unless there are any
objections within the next few days. (But if distribution rebuilds show
excessive fallout from this change - much more than you'd generally expect
from a new GCC or glibc version - we may need to reconsider.)
From b9c1e6917d284b578bcce7b3dc42b4e258b004c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:50:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Deprecate __ptr_t
* NEWS: Mention this.
* misc/sys/cdefs.h (__ptr_t): Mark it as deprecated.
---
ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
NEWS | 2 +-
misc/sys/cdefs.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2017-08-08 Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
+
+ Deprecate __ptr_t
+ * NEWS: Mention this.
+ * misc/sys/cdefs.h (__ptr_t): Mark it as deprecated.
+
2017-08-08 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
* malloc/mcheck.c (old_free_hook): Use void * instead of __ptr_t.
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Major new features:
Deprecated and removed features, and other changes affecting compatibility:
- [Add deprecations, removals and changes affecting compatibility here]
+* The __ptr_t macro is deprecated. Programs should use 'void *' instead.
Changes to build and runtime requirements:
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
#define __STRING(x) #x
/* This is not a typedef so `const __ptr_t' does the right thing. */
-#define __ptr_t void *
+#define __ptr_t void * __glibc_macro_warning ("__ptr_t is deprecated")
/* C++ needs to know that types and declarations are C, not C++. */
--
2.13.3